ComCom to step in over high fuel prices

Minister of Energy and Resources Megan Woods has accepted MBIE's recommendations.

Energy and Resources Minister Megan Woods says fuel prices remain too high in NZ.

0
0:00 0:10

The Commerce Commission will be given new powers to compel fuel companies to provide more information on how fuel prices are set.

The government plans to amend the Commerce Act to have new market study powers by the end of 2018, which will help determine if any further action in the fuel market needs to be taken.  

This follows a Ministry of Business (MBIE) update on the Fuel Market Financial Performance Study, which highlighted concerns that petrol companies were charging too much for fuel.

The update, in the form of a briefing to Energy and Resources Minister Megan Woods, suggests the government assesses three options.

The first is to “let the market play itself out,” with the government taking a hands-off approach and limiting its role to just simply monitoring the market.

The second option suggests exploring further analysis through a Commerce Commission-led market study – this could lead to regulatory intervention.

The last option is direct government intervention but any information as to what this could entail has been redacted from the briefing paper.

MBIE recommends the government adopt the second option as providing any strong recommendations on government intervention before a market study has been undertaken would be “premature.”

“This briefing suggests amending the Commerce Act to give the Commerce Commission powers to conduct market studies, supported by information-gathering powers. This would be the preferred vehicle for undertaking this task.”

Ms Woods and Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Kris Faafoi have opted for the middle ground and asked officials to fast-track work to enable the commission to undertake market studies.

“This power compels companies to provide information to the Commerce Commission to fully understand how markets are functioning,” Mr Faafoi says.

He adds that having thorough information and “shining a light on a market” enables the government to decide if “more action needs to be taken.”

But what “more action” could mean is unclear as any mention of options for government intervention in the fuel market within the briefing is redacted.

However, the briefing says any of these options “would require legislative change and result in varying degrees of disruption, and associated risks, to current industry practices.”

Z Energy spokesman Jonathan Hill says he welcomes the Commerce Commission's new role as consumers deserve to have questions answered with facts. He says the petrol company has allowed the release of its submission to MBIE for this stage of the process with only minimal redactions.

"We need to categorically and, once and for all, get to the bottom of this issue and provide the facts and assurances that consumers and stakeholders want and deserve," he says. "The reviews so far have been inconclusive and a Commerce Commission market study seems a sensible way to go about it."

A long and costly process
MBIE says a market-led study by the Commerce Commission is likely to be “lengthy, costly, litigious, very burdensome both in terms of internal resourcing requirements and costs to fuel suppliers and for a result that is highly uncertain.

“Were the market study to result in the government deciding on some form of legislative intervention to promote greater levels of competition in the sector, then this would push the timeframes out to the early 2020s at the earliest before any structural change occurred.”

MBIE says the government needs to weigh the costs and risks of the market-led study against the potential materiality of the wealth transfer from consumers to fuel suppliers.

“The risks of doing nothing with pre-tax premium petrol prices, now the highest in the OECD, seems far more unsatisfactory. The potential wealth transfer from consumers to fuel suppliers since 2008 is likely measured in the hundreds of millions of dollars a year.”

The background
In July, the Fuel Market Financial Performance Study outlined the New Zealand fuel market “may not be consistent with a workably competitive market.”

It couldn’t definitively say whether fuel prices were reasonable or not – given Z Energy, BP, Mobil, Caltex and Gull did not provide comparable financial data – but it had “reason to believe they might not be.”

Z’s shares dropped 3.6% after the report was released earlier this year.

At the time, then energy and resource minister Judith Collins conceded there is “obviously an issue” and was pushing to see prices addressed by fuel companies.

Although petrol prices dropped in the weeks leading up to the report’s release, they have since crept back up.

Yesterday, AA spokesman Mark Stockdale said petrol prices are too high and fuel company’s margins are well above 40c a litre.

“The margins have increased recently thanks to a drop in the cost of importing fuel. So that means the companies should be dropping the price at the pump. They haven’t done so, and we think they should,” he says.

All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.


15 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.


This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

Post Comment

15 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

I assume I am not the only one seeing the cognitive dissonance of a government complaining about high petrol prices while being about to add to them in the Auckland region - and never thinking about removing some of the taxes/levies/fees they impose that makes our fuel almost twice as expensive as Australia.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Get real

One is charging Aucklanderrs for Auckland infrastructure and today's announcement is a proactive response to the oil companies ripping us off for the past 5 or more years - all under Nationals watch.
At least now we have a government that doesn't get bought out by oil company lobbyists.

Reply
Share
  • 1
  • 0

Oh I am realistic. That's why I laugh so hysterically when I hear that Wellington parasites pay so much more for their fuel.

$0.67 per litre + GST is what we already pay in taxes - imagine if we payed at the same rate as Australia does. Gosh that would make the poor a lot better off than useless light rail but it would also mean that some poor civil servant might have to forgoe flying business class to their next Global Warming conference.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Mr G. Kiwi is absolutely correct Mr Scribe. You yourself I have noticed frequently exhibit bouts of "cognitive dissonance".
Given the make-up of your beloved coalition you cannot be blamed.
In fact, bouts of "cognitive dissonance" are going to be seen all over the place as "your beloved coalition" struggles to survive.
I will be as Mr G Kiwi, be amused at the troubled people and enjoy pointing out their hypocrisy and "back-flips", aka as "cognitive dissonance".

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

I now see what you mean after looking up dissonance in the dictionary.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

i thought the govt liked high petrol prices more gst lol

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Maybe a study into our banks and banking system next?

Or as the Australians are going for a Royal Commission maybe NZ should too?

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Only going for those who made smaller political donations
Pity Collins didnt finish this
Its a rort on all of NZ
Fuel vouchers are a Ponzi scheme hiding true pricing

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

So the ComCom are going to investigate despite the fact they allowed Z Energy to have ~50% market share following the acquisition of Caltex and referenced evidence of price 'cooperation' almost 20 times in their approval report?This is a joke... The ComCom have proven they are either inept or can be swayed by the government of the day.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

The Commerce Commission allows mergers and acquisitions saying 'it won't affect competition significantly', but all the insignificant little reductions always add up to quite a lot. At the end of the process of course you have a duopoly.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

So we might be getting overcharged for our petrol? Finally someone in govt has noticed. It's only been that way since, oh I don't know, since about 1977. 40 years latter they're going to take some action. I'm known for my patience, but this is ridiculous.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

The quicker we bring in eletrek vehicles with lower prices, and a better range, the better of we will all be, get rid of those dinosaur fuel companies.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

You do realise that we won't be any better off with electric cars than petrol driven ones. Once the great unwashed are all driving round in electric powered cars, all that tax that is currently being charged on petrol, will just be transferred onto your electric charge. The time to own an electric car is now, while there's no tax on the charge. The smart people are currently creaming it. I'm surprised the govt isn't taxing them. Still as they say, make hay while the suns shines, because it won't last.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

It would be good to see suburb-by-suburb price discrimination end in Auckland. Every time I drive through Manakau Central notice their petrol is priced a few cents above Auckland Central and Manakau East.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Maybe MBIE might also like to comment on the cost of "consultants" and the amount of taxpayer funds that are "transferred" away from taxpayers to "consultants" and "contractors"?
Also just where does MBIE fit in to this? Are we funding two "market watch dogs"?

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot

Forex

Sym Price Change
USD 0.6930 0.0022 0.32%
AUD 0.9197 0.0024 0.26%
EUR 0.5885 0.0019 0.32%
GBP 0.5193 0.0017 0.33%
HKD 5.4101 0.0171 0.32%
JPY 78.6310 0.2000 0.26%

Commods

Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1241.8 -3.820 2017-12-11T00:
Oil Brent 64.7 1.290 2017-12-11T00:
Oil Nymex 58.0 0.670 2017-12-11T00:
Silver Index 15.7 -0.038 2017-12-11T00:

Indices

Symbol Open High Last %
NASDAQ 6847.6 6879.8 6840.1 0.51%
DJI 24338.1 24389.7 24329.2 0.23%