Cellphone snatch 'pure hell' for driving business

Clive Matthew-Wilson

Police should confiscate cellphones from motorists caught using them while driving.

Dog and Lemon Guide motoring commentator Clive Matthew-Wilson says police have the power to make motorists’ lives “pure hell” if they are caught using the banned technology.

In the year to November 2011, 10,070 drivers were caught using cellphones. Last year, this figure rose to 12,973.

In the year to March 2012, 149 crashes were thought to have been at least partly caused by mobile use. Since 2007, 28 people have died on New Zealand roads in accidents said to have been caused by drivers using cellphones.

“Ticketing and fines are not changing driver behaviour. Immediate cellphone confiscation by police would hit cellphone users where it hurts," Mr Matthew-Wilson says.

“For many people, including business owners and employees, cellphones are now their primary means of communication. The loss of their cellphone, with all its contacts, would be devastating to most cellphone users, and a powerful motivation to change behaviour.”

He told NBR ONLINE he has noticed a huge uptake in hands-free car kit technology, especially from businesses keen to stay connected while on the road.

“Large businesses especially have hands-free kits installed in their fleet. But there has been a tremendous resurgence recently in the use of phones while driving.”

Wireless communication company Digital Logistics Group distributes Parrot Bluetooth technology. Spokesman Gary Davis says the kits are constantly in demand.

The company could hardly keep up with demand from installers in 2009, when cellphone use while driving was outlawed, but things are almost as busy now.

Mr Davis says one thing which keeps installers busy is the constant refit to new company lease vehicles.

Under Mr Matthew-Wilson’s proposal to confiscate the phones, every police car would carry a pre-printed receipt book and a few pre-paid padded courier envelopes.

Instead of issuing a ticket, the officer would instruct the offending driver to write his or her address onto the envelope.

The officer would then place the cellphone into the envelope, seal it and arrange for a courier to pick up the envelope from the local police station. The offender would get his/her cellphone back by courier in a few days.


5 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

Post Comment

5 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

Why are the courier envelopes pre-paid and padded? Why do the idiots get them couriered back to an address of their convenience? Stick them in the cheapest envelopes, send them to the nearest PostShop and charge them for the cost of post and packaging when they pick them up.

  • 0
  • 0

Tell the idiots that for a front-up fee of $20 or similar a padded prepaid envelope will be provided on the spot for them to self-address and seal that phone inside and the package will be put in a mail box in four weeks!

Simple, straight forward, no admin costs and one heck of a deterrent.
So where's the problem?

Like rearing kids or training dogs, be firm, be fair, give ample notice and stick to your word.

  • 0
  • 0

Hair Hair, Clive.

  • 0
  • 0

There's a forum here for cellphone users (road safety abusers). Where are you all? Calling talkback?

  • 0
  • 0

Why doesn't the government also get to tell us what colour underwear is or is not permissible?

I am not even sure it has been even prima facie shown, much less conclusively proven, that using them while driving increases danger (see eg, http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/08/why-cell-phone-bans-dont-w...) but just because some bureaucrats in Wellington decree suddenly it is a menace to society.

Even if it were dangerous, assuming arguendo, so what. Many things in life have an element of danger to them.

New Zealand is the only country in the world ridiculously obsessed with the road toll, and it seems to be police (and media) hysteria to justify more encroachment on the populace.

Life is dangerous, folks. Some politician in Wellington or some uneducated constable in Auckland is not going to protect you. We live on a small rock, circling a massive fireball in an infinitely cold, dark universe. Whoever promised you safety (except, of course, mommy politician and daddy policeman)?

  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot


Sym Price Change
USD 0.7324 0.0027 0.37%
AUD 0.9189 -0.0015 -0.16%
EUR 0.6120 0.0009 0.15%
GBP 0.5394 0.0020 0.37%
HKD 5.7182 0.0231 0.41%
JPY 82.0270 -0.0240 -0.03%


Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1290.6 -9.820 2017-09-21T00:
Oil Brent 56.1 0.160 2017-09-21T00:
Oil Nymex 50.5 -0.130 2017-09-21T00:
Silver Index 16.9 -0.316 2017-09-21T00:


Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 7795.4 7814.8 7795.4 0.25%
NASDAQ 6448.6 6448.6 6456.0 -0.52%
DAX 12569.7 12646.6 12600.0 -0.04%
DJI 22414.0 22419.5 22412.6 -0.24%
FTSE 7263.9 7288.2 7263.9 0.09%
HKSE 27949.8 27960.9 28110.3 -0.82%
NI225 20413.6 20417.1 20347.5 -0.25%
ASX 5655.4 5688.2 5655.4 0.47%