Court rejects StuffMe merger appeal

NZME chief executive Michael Boggs said he was disappointed with the decision.
nzmadd to my Stocks
$
100.000%
Volume:

LATEST: Lawyer sees angle for Fairfax, NZME to pursue if they push on to Court of Appeal

The High Court has dismissed an appeal brought by NZME Ltd, Fairfax Ltd and Fairfax New Zealand Ltd (the appellants) against the Commerce Commission’s May 2017 decision refusing their proposed merger.

The media companies were told of the decision yesterday and the court has published a media release to ensure the market is fully informed. A full judgment will follow “as soon as possible” the court said.

In a key finding, the court upheld the Commerce Commission’s jurisdiction to consider non-economic or financial detriments in the relevant markets, particularly the damage arising from loss of media plurality.

The court’s judgment said: “On all the evidence before the commission, we consider it is appropriate to attribute material importance to maintaining media plurality. It can claim status as a fundamental value in a modern democratic society. We cannot be certain a material loss of plurality will occur because of the factors we review that would hopefully assist in maintaining it.

“However, the risk is clearly a meaningful one and, if it occurred, it would have major ramifications for the quality of New Zealand democracy. In our analysis of the clearance application appeal we have recognised material barriers to entry in the market for production of New Zealand news. We agree with the commission that a substantial loss of media plurality would be virtually irreplaceable. The court found the commission was also entitled to place significant weight on the prospect of reduced quality of the products produced by the merged entity.”

The decision rejects a core argument of the media companies’ appeal, which sought to persuade the court that the commission had strayed beyond its powers in considering the qualitative effects of their media dominance.

The High Court upheld the commission’s view that the merger would have produced a substantial lessening of competition in relation to four of six markets.

However, it decided the commission had not proved its case in the advertising market for Sunday newspapers and it also dismissed the prospect of one of the companies introducing a paywall for their online publication, post a merger.

NZME, the publisher of the New Zealand Herald and broadcaster of several commercial radio stations, sought clearance or authorisation from the commission in May 2016 to merge with Fairfax New Zealand, publisher of several news titles including the Stuff website and the Dominion Post.

The commission declined the merger in May this year, leading the companies to appeal.

The court indicated the commission was entitled to costs.

In a statement to the NZX, NZME chief executive Michael Boggs said he was disappointed by the court’s decision.

“While the Fairfax merger offered us benefits, we have not been resting on our laurels in the past 18 months as we pursued the transaction.

“We will continue to examine shareholder value enhancing strategic initiatives leveraging our strong brands and audience reach, while enhancing the competitiveness of content generation and distribution.”

NZME said it would review the court’s judgment when it was released and consider the option of a further appeal.

The court said the Commission would be entitled to claim payment from NZME and Fairfax for its costs.


14 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

Post Comment

14 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

Well stuff me that's good news. Even though they are pretty much the same anyway, at least this frees us a little bit from complete Jeff Bezos/WaPo media domination...

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

I find the Herald to just be a site for over-advertising, and stuff.co is just a trash news site. But that's just me. I'm sure others may enjoy them.

Reply
Share
  • 1
  • 0

Not so much - hence the merger applications. And all because these organisations attempting to be and make the news instead of just reporting the facts.

Now we get the situation where the MSM see themselves so much as part of the news, they even create politicians the likes of Jacinda / Taxarella... And look where that's taking NZinc.

Good job. The MSM will be left to fester in the swamp of their own making. #owngoal #karma

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

I believe you're right. If it wasn't for SPY and VIVA, most people wouldn't have no reason to even look at the Herald.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Judicial activism?

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Hell, I only subscribe to the Herald because of the WordWheel. Some days, I get the word real quick; other days, it can take a bit longer.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Good news for Newsroom

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Indeed they are indeed quiet over achievers for sure.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Wouldn't of thought it would make any difference either way. There is plenty of room for more Newsroom type players. The market is very different from 5-10 years ago. Provided the content is 'suitable' for a specific audience, the distribution of that content is relatively cost-less and the channels easily accessible. Having the biggest audience does not guarantee success and/or quality of product. A merger could well have enhanced the proposition and market positioning of players like Newsroom - surprising to see them so dismissive of the merger.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

I expect notification of major restructures will be imminent, as per Ivan's post the quality of both NZME and Fairfax journalism is just appalling.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Sack the Editors! All they can come up with day after day is housing nonsense!

Beat up home owners every day making them feel guilty for working hard to pay the mortgage!

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch of blokes.. Thankfully the lawyers have a few quiet weeks on the beach to dream up the next wacky argument to engage this half wit media management team, and ensure they don't miss their January revenue targets... ho ho ho...

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Their business model is flawed and will ultimately lead to the demise of both companies, with the reliance on newsprint for income their content must be relevant and currently its akin to mutton dressed as lamb

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

The ComCom and the High Court have now said "Stuff You" Mr Boggs!

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.