Details of R&D incentives crucial; doubt on ring-fencing rentals

EY head of tax policy David Snell says “I'm not convinced it's good policy."

EY's David Snell on R&D incentives and extra tax collection

0
0:00 0:10

The Coalition government's budget provides for research and development (R&D) incentives of $1 billion over four years.

Finance Minister Grant Robertson says New Zealand spends just 1.3% of GDP on R&D, below the OECD average of 2.4%.

The new incentive will give eligible businesses 12.5c in the dollar back and this will be available for all businesses spending more than $100,000 a year on R&D.

The government is also expecting to recoup an extra $726.3 million in revenue over the next four years through cracking down on tax dodgers, ring-fencing rental losses and collecting GST from offshore suppliers.

NBR understands the R&D incentives is new spending and not a substitute for Callaghan Innovation. No decision has been made yet on what's happening to Callaghan.

EY's head of tax policy David Snell says it's interesting New Zealand is increasing R&D incentives at the same time that Australia is reducing its and that should make investing in New Zealand more attractive.

“I'm broadly supportive of an R&D tax credit. Innovation is important and there's a case for business expenditure to increase,” Mr Snell says.

The $1 billion over four years sounds about the right amount to allocate, based on past and overseas experience, he says.

“This credit needs to be sustainable. Ten years ago we had a one-year wonder that wasted everybody's time including EY's and is definitely the businesses' concern, so design is vital.”

The incentive plan is out for consultation and Revenue Minister Stuart Nash says the government is "having very productive conversations with businesses around the country."

But one thing missing is a provision for “refundability," Mr Snell says.

That is, that businesses making losses need to be able to claim 12.5c in the dollar, not just have it added to accumulated losses, so that the cashflow of such businesses is enhanced, Mr Snell says.

“Also, there needs to be a strong audit component because this is the kind of area that could blow out if not tightly managed and well designed.”

IRD enforcement
Mr Snell says he thinks the government could have allocated more money to Inland Revenue to ensure outstanding company tax returns are filed.

The government has allocated $31.3m over the next four years to the IRD and expects it to recover about $183.3m.

Mr Snell says it is only assuming a return of $6 for every dollar spent on enforcement when the IRD's track record shows it collects about $8 for every dollar spent.

And a recent study showed small businesses are underestimating tax by about 20%.

“There has to be scope for Inland Revenue to use a stick and carrot, education and more audit funds to close that gap,” Mr Snell says.

He is sceptical about the estimate that ring-fencing landlords' rental losses will bring in at least $325m over four years.

“I'm not convinced it's good policy. I don't see anything that's so special that will have a significant impact on the property market,” he says.

“My initial reaction is that I'm surprised that's going to bring in $300m – I'll be investigating that further.”


8 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.


This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

Post Comment

8 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

The No.8 wire mentality needs to be supported and this will go some way in getting NZ front and centre.

The debarcle that Callaghan Innovation was needs to be redressed and investing is the way to go unless we want to fall behind in this race.

Reply
Share
  • 1
  • 0

All well and good, but I'd like to keep more of the profit my business makes so we can update equipment, increase wages, redevelop facilities, hire more staff...

Reply
Share
  • 1
  • 0

The Labour govt won't like you with thinking like that.

Reply
Share
  • 2
  • 0

Just get on with it

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Zimbabwe Leaders have read their Budget, borrowing 17 Billion as people in Otara are still poor as Labour have done nothing for them ! ----Tenants will be kicked out of their rentals and face huge increases thanks to Labours ringfencing policy !

Jacinder smiles as she heads back to her Two Million dollar Mansion in the expensive Mount Albert area.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

It is wrong to suggest the Australian Government is reducing R&D incentives what they are doing is making it much more difficult to claim incentives unless you are doing real research and that the research you are being encouraged to do is incremental to BAU. They have increased government funding of scientific research by $AUD1.9B and expect to reduce the R&D tax credit system by $AUD2.4B all over the forward estimates. They did not take up the recommendation for research and business collaboration incentives which is disappointing but this may yet come. As someone who is now working in the Australian and NZ research and commercialisation space I see both countries doing different things exceptionally well. It would be great to see the best from both sides of the ditch combined into an effective R&D policy.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

So in Australia they are reducing R&D tax credits by $2.4 billion? how is that not reducing incentives? Even taking into account the $1.9 billion of say new R&D funding for scientific research that is a $500m reduction overall.

If the $2.4 billion saving is from people rorting the system then does raise concerns about how these tax credits are operated, but the fact is it is still a reduction.

I would suggest that the NZ government should be looking at how it invests in R&D and innovation, as you know there have been some real shocking results from some organisations that have been milking the system for a long time. I suggest before they spend more maybe they should hold those that have recieved fundign before accountable for results before handing any further funds to them (or their investees).

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

To say you ‘work’ in these spaces is a bold statement

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.