InternetNZ is hailing the French Constitutional Council's decision to strike down a a proposed ‘three-strikes’ law for copyright infringers as unconstitutional.
The controversial law, known as Hadopi, an acronym for the body established to police the law, would have cut off Internet access to those who repeatedly download copyrighted content illegally, much as the controversial Section 92a Act proposed to do in New Zealand before being junked by the National Party.
Music labels and movie studios were to monitor file-sharing web sites to identify computers downloading copyrighted content and report them to a government committee, which could require Internet-service providers to identify the offenders.
The committee would have warned the offender by email and registered mail before cutting off their internet access for up to a year if the illegal downloads continued.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy had argued the law would be crucial to protecting artistic creation in the digital era.
But the Council found the law violated both the constitutional right to freedom of expression and the right to presumption of innocence.
“It follows,” wrote the Court, “that in principle the legislature does not establish a presumption of guilt in criminal matters”. The Court also said exercising freedom of expression and communication, including that performed over the internet, is a prerequisite for democracy.
“Attacks on the exercise of this freedom must be necessary, appropriate and proportionate to the aim pursued,” it said.
Accordingly the law will lose the "third-strike" of cutting off internet access, and the government agency only will be permitted to send out mail and email warnings to suspected pirates. Further sanctions will require going to court.
InternetNZ has welcomed the ruling, calling it a victory for democracy that highlights the absurdity of legislative cures.
“New Zealand too has a strong assertion to individual freedom of expression and human rights. The French decision serves as a reminder that enacting such draconian copyright law is both disproportionate and unfit for purpose”, said InternetNZ Executive Director Keith Davidson.
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
- New government: Winston builds an alibi for an economic slowdown
- English: ‘We will regroup’
- Variety of insults as Aussie media reacts to New Zealand's new government
- Callaghan can’t claw back millions in grants to failed CricHQ
- Annual net migration continues to cool in September as more Kiwis eye exit
Most listened to
- NZ First leader Winston Peters on why he sided with Labour and reaction from Rob Hosking
- Iron Duke director Phil O'Reilly on how concerned businesses should be about the new Labour-led government
- Pacific Edge may have a good product, but Tim Hunter questions why it's still yet to deliver on its commercial promise
- If there's anything we have learned from this election, it's that government will continue ticking along, says Matthew Hooton
- McGrathNicol's Conor McElhinney on why the liquidity pool is no longer rising
- NBR Radio: The best interviews, with Grant Walker — updated daily