The government is looking at measures to encourage more forestry planting as it examines whether locally grown forests will be cheaper than buying foreign carbon credits to meet its climate change targets.
Climate Change Minister Paula Bennett told the Climate Change and Business Conference in Auckland that "how to get more trees in the ground" is a key part of its work on the supply of carbon credits into the country's emissions trading scheme in the 2020s.
Earlier this month, the government ratified the new global climate change deal agreed at the annual global conference in Paris last year, ahead of this year's global meeting in Marrakech, Morocco, in December.
The early ratification was motivated by a need to be at the negotiating table when rules are set for the treatment of plantation forestry and land use change, details of which will help determine how difficult it will be for New Zealand to meet its obligations under the Paris agreement.
New Zealand committed to cut its greenhouse gas emissions 30% below 2005 levels by 2030, using a combination of local emissions reductions, storing carbon in forests and buying international carbon credits.
"Forestry is so important because it's our most important source of domestic emission removals," Mrs Bennett says. "It can deliver at scale.
"If forestry is cheaper than buying international units, and we think it might be, there is a strong economic case for planting more trees. For example: investing in 10,000 hectares of forestry in 2018 will deliver 3.1 million tonnes of abatement over the 2020s, of the 235 million in total we need to reach our 2030 target.
"This could reduce the number of units we'll need to purchase internationally. A key focus of the ETS review is looking at how to promote more planting by ensuring there is a good price incentive to plant trees, but we are looking wider than this."
Among forestry policy changes under consideration were "how to make the New Zealand ETS more attractive to foresters. We know that forests (and foresters) come in all shapes and sizes, so it's a matter of understanding what mix of approaches fit best," she says.
"This includes looking at how forestry is accounted for in the New Zealand ETS, and how to reduce some of the administrative and compliance costs faced by both foresters and the government."
Plantation foresters have faced major policy uncertainty under the government's climate change policies. The price of carbon collapsed below 50c a tonne earlier this decade when major emitters were allowed to use low-quality and sometimes fraudulent credits bought from former Soviet blocs to offset local emissions.
Policy changes since then have seen the price of carbon rise, with the removal of a subsidy for major emitters earlier this year pushing New Zealand units of carbon to $18.80 per tonne from about $7 a year ago.
Foresters have said $15 a tonne is a trigger price for justifying plantation forestry investment but the industry is gun-shy, having ramped up planting in the past only to see policy changes undermine their decisions.
Mrs Bennett says "businesses need to know where policy is heading over the next five, 10 and 15 years so that they can have confidence when investing in new technologies."
"That's absolutely my commitment."
She says forestry also offers environmental and economic benefits beyond their impact on climate change and that forestry policy will include encouragement for permanent and native forestry, as well as what Environmental Defence Society head Gary Taylor called "pinus radiata syndrome."
Erosion control, biodiversity and water quality benefits are all available from forest planting, along with opportunities for regional and iwi economies, and carbon removals beyond 2030, Mrs Bennett says.
She hoped to have a National Policy Statement on climate change in place in the next 12 months or so.
But Mrs Bennett expressed scepticism about suggestions New Zealand should adopt a UK-style Committee on Climate Change, even as the government has begun efforts to gain cross-parliamentary support for key elements of long-term climate change policy.
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
- Fletcher staff knew early last year the Justice precinct was a financial disaster
- Electric vehicle owners not experiencing range anxiety says Flip the Fleet
- Congress throws up potential roadblock for Eroad in the US
- Sensible or shambolic? The government's immigration U-turn
- Sky TV offers $20/month deal as competition heats up
Most listened to
- MBM founder Matt Bale discusses Green Party social media strategy
- If Boris is going to buy any more wool from us, it’ll be to try to pull it over our eyes, says Rob Hosking
- Synlait MD John Penno on China's regulatory and food safety systems
- Eroad boss Steven Newman on being caught in political crossfire in the US
- Sportsmen may soon be surging onto the NBR Rich List, says Eric Young
- NBR Radio: best of the week ended July 21, with Grant Walker