InternetNZ: new copyright law impossible without TelstraClear

S92 should now be repealed altogether, InternetNZ says. Implementation of the controversial clause of the delayed copyright law, and the associated ISP code of practice, without the third-largest internet service provider on board would “invite disaster.”

User advocate and .nz domain name commercial administrator InternetNZ says TelstraClear's decision to bail on the Telecommunications Carriers' Forum (TCF) copyright code of practice means the government should promptly repeal s92.

Executive director Keith Davidson, a long-time s92 critic, says TelstraClear's decision means the TCF cannot now implement the code.

"It is clear that the agreement that the government sought will not now be reached between ISPs and rights holders. To attempt to bring s92 into force now would invite disaster,” Mr Davidson says.

InternetNZ is a member of the TCF working party on S92, and will continue to participate, says Mr Davidson: “The working party’s efforts have made the best of an impossible job, and the work has not been wasted. InternetNZ will continue to contribute to the development of the code, while recognising that it can no longer be implemented in the way that was expected.”

Government agency could step in
TCF chief executive Ralph Chivers tells NBR that unanimous consent among its member ISPs and telcos is needed to pass the voluntary code, as requested by Prime Minister John Key when he delayed the Copyright Amendment (New Technologies) Act on February 23.

With no united front between ISPs now possible, “the document will fail” says Mr Chivers, and an independent mediator between the TCF and rightsholders like RIANZ cannot be appointed.

Justice Minister Simon Power has pledged to step in if the two parties can’t reach a voluntary agreement by Mr Key’s March 27 deadline.

Mr Chivers says he has updated the minister on TelstraClear’s withdrawal but has yet to receive a response.

With the envisaged independent industry mediator now apparently off the table, another option is for a government agency to assume the same role, says Mr Chivers, who has previously envisaged a disputes tribunal style process to deal with minor cases of alleged copyright infringement. “There are government agencies already there who could do the job.”

Other lobby groups were quick to praise Telstra’s move.

The Telecommunications users association "agrees entirely with TelstraClear that the law is flawed,” chief executive Ernie Newman says.

“The position they have taken is very principled. It genuinely reflects concern that any code adopted by the TCF could effectively close off options for the industry’s customers who are owners of business networks [which could be defined as ISPs under s92]

“At the same time Tuanz recognises the frustration this development will mean for the many people within and around the TCF who have tried very hard to get a code together despite knowing they were dealing with very poor legislation."

7 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

Post Comment

7 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

The Telecommunications Carriers' Forum (TCF) was given the job of doing something the Govt has avocated but doesn't want to carry the responsibility for.
S92 will still go through but the Govt will have to do it's own dirty work, and be seen to be doing it.
I have no problem with people being disconnected as long as the usual rule of law applies.

  • 0
  • 0

I applaud TelstraClear for taking this action. The TCF attempt to put some sanity around S92 was bound to result in a compromise given the seriously flawed nature of the legislation.

Fix the problem, skip the band aid.

  • 0
  • 0

Fantastic decision by TC - this legislation is flawed and their decision to not make bad legislation work can only be saluted. I'm very proud to be one of their customers

  • 0
  • 0

As a customer of TelstraClear I am fully supportive of their actions in this instance. The legislation is unworkable, which is no doubt a reflection from the proponents - i.e. the "Hollywood" label lobbyists - and should be thrown out.
Theyre just using NZ as a case study for Australia, we cant allow this attempt of controlling our technological lifestyles to occur. John Key and Simon Power seem to be showing the population that they support freedom of information, the concept of 'innocent until proven guilty', and giving due respect to privacy. KEEP IT UP.
There is definitely a need to halt piracy, but s92 is not it.
This country is NOT the United States of Control, dammit.

  • 0
  • 0

I too support TelstraClear's actions against the flawed copyright law.

  • 0
  • 0

Good On Telstra Clear but does this mean we are not part of the law can we still enjoy the freedom of music and movies? Or is there still some law to it.

  • 0
  • 0

So does this mean telstra clear users still have the freedom to surf the net and enjoy music and movies?
Please answer.

And also Telstra clear Is going to get so much more money for this. Good on you Telstra Clear I am a Proud Customer.

  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot


Sym Price Change
USD 0.7325 0.0006 0.08%
AUD 0.9140 0.0002 0.02%
EUR 0.6107 0.0004 0.07%
GBP 0.5417 0.0005 0.09%
HKD 5.7150 0.0087 0.15%
JPY 81.7130 0.0760 0.09%


Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1310.9 3.470 2017-09-19T00:
Oil Brent 55.2 -0.260 2017-09-19T00:
Oil Nymex 49.5 -0.330 2017-09-19T00:
Silver Index 17.2 0.054 2017-09-19T00:


Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 7765.4 7772.8 7764.5 0.03%
NASDAQ 6465.6 6467.8 6454.6 0.10%
DAX 12556.5 12566.2 12559.4 0.02%
DJI 22349.7 22386.0 22331.3 0.18%
FTSE 7253.3 7285.7 7253.3 0.30%
HKSE 28099.3 28120.6 28051.4 0.01%
NI225 20301.3 20323.1 20299.4 -0.06%
ASX 5713.6 5713.6 5713.6 -0.33%