Mandatory investor carbon reporting could spread to NZ

AXA Investment Managers global head of responsible investing Matt Christensen

New Zealand, Australia, and Canada could be among the first countries outside the European Union to follow France's pioneering move this year to introduce mandatory climate change-related reporting for institutional investors.

The reporting obligations are set out under Article 173 of France's law on Energy Transition for Green Growth which came into effect in January this year. The law applies to a wide range of investors including pension and social security funds and they have until the end of June 2017 to deliver the information.

The law requires them to say how they will integrate environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into their investment policies along with risk management where appropriate.

They also have to state how they're incorporating climate change considerations, including how they are contributing to international efforts to cap global warming and support France's energy transition.

Because France is the first country to bring in mandatory carbon reporting for investors, it has attracted a lot of interest from other legislators, AXA Investment Managers global head of responsible investing Matt Christensen says.

Mr Christensen told the Responsible Investment Association conference that it would take another two years before the law spread to the rest of the European Union while it assessed how industry participants dealt with the new requirements.

"It's unusual for French law because it is prescriptive," he said, taking it beyond previous "tick the box" exercises.

Asset owners, including the New Zealand Superannuation Fund, that already disclose their carbon footprint and report on their climate change strategy, have done so off their own bat.

He says it is natural to think this type of legislation may extend to countries like New Zealand, although it will require a less "investment-type approach" to fiduciary duty to investors.

The UN Principles for Responsible Investment published a report last year that found fiduciary duty is not a barrier to asset owners' action on ESG factors, despite it being a controversial issue, particularly in the United States.

Asset managers and advisers have often claimed including non-financial indicators in their investment decision-making would breach their fiduciary duty and used that as a reason not to incorporate ESG factors. But the UNPRI said there was growing recognition that ESG issues were financially material to a portfolio.

An RIA poll of New Zealand consumers showed 81% believe it is important KiwiSaver funds consider ESG factors as part of delivering good investment products and financial returns, although only a third weighted other factors as important as financial returns.

The poll followed controversy earlier this year when it was revealed a significant number of KiwiSaver investors had unwittingly put their money in funds that were invested in arms manufacturers and big tobacco companies.

More respondents - 42% - think it is better to keep an investment and try to influence a company's behaviour than sell up, but 39% had no opinion.

When it came to exclusions under ethical investing, whaling, nuclear power industries, and tobacco ranked highest ahead of military armaments and fossil fuels.


5 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

Post Comment

5 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

God forbid!!

  • 0
  • 0

What nonsense. CO2 - which IS NOT carbon - is a trace gas that benefits agriculture and does not cause dangerous global warming.

2016 was, according to on of five temperature records, the warmest yet. The more accurate satellite records show it was by a tiny margin over 1998. This proves that any warming over the last 18 years is tiny and way below predictions.

AGW is the biggest hoax in the history of the world!

  • 1
  • 0

With all due respect, Brian, your comments are nonsense. It always amazes me that some people readily accept the ability of scientists to create the myriad of wonders (TV, internet, etc, etc) that are now available to us but will not accept what scientists say on topics such as global warming. We agree that carbon dioxide benefits agriculture but this doesn't detract from the fact that excess is harmful to other aspects of life on earth. Your statement that "This proves that any warming over the last 18 years is tiny and way below predictions" is illogical and irrelevant.

  • 0
  • 1

Mandatory. Carbon. Reporting.

That sounds like you hit the socialist buzzword trifecta right there!

Congratulations you win a free pass to propaganda indoctrination college for churnalism.

  • 0
  • 0

It's all gotten out of control

  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot


Sym Price Change
USD 0.7269 0.0000 0.00%
AUD 0.9101 0.0000 0.00%
EUR 0.5951 0.0000 0.00%
GBP 0.5249 0.0000 0.00%
HKD 5.6856 0.0000 0.00%
JPY 80.4820 0.0000 0.00%


Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1331.0 4.850 2018-01-19T00:
Oil Brent 68.6 -0.710 2018-01-19T00:
Oil Nymex 63.4 -0.580 2018-01-19T00:
Silver Index 17.0 0.090 2018-01-19T00:


Symbol Open High Last %
NASDAQ 7312.0 7336.4 7296.1 0.55%
DJI 25987.3 26071.7 26017.8 0.21%