What's New Zealand's answer to the Impossible burger?

Beef & Lamb report author Lee-Ann Marsh says the industry needs to stocktake its collective response to the threat of meat substitutes.

A new report assessing consumer response to protein highlights the threats and opportunity for New Zealand’s traditional animal-based agriculture.

New Zealand’s animal-based protein export revenue alone accounts for 60% of the country’s total primary exports and demand is expected to grow as the global population is forecast to rise to 8.1 billion by 2025.

The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) and Plant & Food 's joint report The Evolution of Plant Protein – assessing consumer response signals change for traditional animal protein producers. It says while animal proteins continue to appeal to traditional consumer preferences, such as taste and functionality, a growing drive for more sustainable and healthier lifestyles is positioned to shift that emphasis to plant protein products.

There has been a new wave of innovative meat and dairy substitutes either already on the market or about to be released, which reduce reliance on animal-based protein.

The global plant-based protein market alone is forecast by Research and Markets to hit $10.8b by 2022 supported by a compound annual growth rate of 6.7% over the five years from 2017.

For New Zealand to retain a competitive edge in primary exports, “we want to ensure we are looking ahead at what the future consumer might demand in our products and what opportunities are available for our sector,” Plant & Food Research’s Dr Jocelyn Eason says.

The report analysed consumer response to plant-based proteins released in the US and consumer attitudes to proteins in China. It found wealthy western economies such as the US will require an innovative protein product that meets all consumer needs in order to see the widespread substitution of traditional animal products for plant protein.

New Zealand’s response should be to develop strategies to mitigate the risk to primary exports from the alternative proteins and maintain and build its reputation as a producer of high-value natural foods, including emphasising traceability and food safety.

It should also identify opportunities for all protein types with targeted research and monitoring, the report says.

The Ministry of Business (MBIE) is already in the early stages of a cross-government initiative to create a unique competitive advantage that will make New Zealand an attractive location for plant-based proteins research.

The meat side
In a separate case study also released by MPI today on the Impossible Burger, the plant-based meat patty being sold in the US, it says alternative meat products have the potential to cause “a level of disruption to the US beef market.”

The US beef market is critical to New Zealand’s well-being given it accounts for 44% of total beef exports and the Kiwi beef sector adds $2.9b value to the economy.

However, the research did find that despite moving closer to replicating the attributes of meat, the taste and texture, price and convenience of preparation of the Impossible Burger still tends to disappoint.

While Impossible Food’s short-term strategy is to expand its presence in US burger chains, long-term it is planning to go international and to expand its range into other meat and dairy products.


Impossible Foods, the US company behind the Impossible Burger, has raised $US396 million in investment since it was founded in 2011.

The New Zealand meat industry is well-aware of the potential threat from alternative proteins, with Beef & Lamb having released its own report in March, Future of Meat. That report concluded alternative proteins are likely to become a major competitor to some of this country’s red meat products and the sector has to come up with a clear strategy to respond to the threat.

It said although alternative proteins are manufactured in small volumes, large-scale production of burger patties and mince is likely within five years. But it also said there is still a strong future for the red meat sector, particularly at the premium end.  

Report author Lee-Ann Marsh says it outlined four likely scenarios for the industry but the outcome is likely to be more a mix of all four. It recommended the red meat industry diversify beyond their own product to protect current volume, to innovate beyond red meat using funding from short-term revenue growth, to 'premium-ise' even further by investing more in product development and value marketing, and expand and grow New Zealand’s share of the sector via differentiation and speed to market.

The Meat Industry Association, representing meat processors, marketers and exporters, is meeting in mid-June to discuss the report and the next steps to take.

Ms Marsh says she wants to see the industry come together to stocktake how what it is doing today lines up with the opportunities highlighted in the report.

“What opportunities do they have as a collective, then what should they doing and not doing and how to start going down that path for making a business case for some of those areas.”

All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.


16 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.


This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

Post Comment

16 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

It will serve us well to capitalise on this growing demand for dairy and meat alternatives. We could utilise our existing logistical network of food produce, build a strategic direction for our high quality export industries and in the process, solve the productivity puzzle through high-value food distribution instead of dealing in bulk commodities.

Reply
Share
  • 2
  • 0

New Zealand is estimated (depending on whose data one believes) to be able to feed 40 million people. In a world with 8 billion people surely we can find 40 million who want a 'real' steak grown from a real cow which ate real grass. The clean food equivalent of the anti-vaxxers if you like. Target those people, charge them heaps, and let the other 7.96 billion worry about themselves.

Reply
Share
  • 3
  • 0

Absolutely

Reply
Share
  • 2
  • 0

And tell the truth about the importance of healthy fats in the avoidance of obesity, diabetes etc.

Reply
Share
  • 2
  • 0

Healthy fats. Eat fats to reduce obesity. What a crock. You won’t find healthy fats in animal products, and anyone with half a brain knows if you want to lose weight or lower your risk of obesity you should consume less calories. Calorie intake > energy burned = weight gain. When is NZ going to wake up and join the market rather than fight against it?

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

MBIE and other government agencies are creating a competitive advantage for NZ for plant based protein research. We are late to the party. $ billions are being invested globally into teams to research and commercialise. What does NZ offer - Plant & Food - they bought us Crop Logic after 30 years.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

These reports read like the camera film industry when digital cameras were first hitting the scene - total denial and no understanding of how disruptive innovation gets adopted.

Meat 2.0 is protein without needing animals. It is a new, better technology with overwhelming economic advantage that our ancient animal based industries simply will not be able to compete with. 95% reduction in input costs compared with current beef production - and when it scales, it will follow the same Silion Valley model of unrelenting, mind-blowingly rapid consumer adoption. Beef industry today is like Taxi companies trying to pretend Uber and ridesharing will always be a niche and people won’t adopt it. SumFood just released a great article on this today that shows just how real this is: https://www.sumfood.com/sumfood-files

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 1

NZ could deliver more kg of plant sourced burger protein/arable hectare to to the plate than the current animal protein model - after all there is not 2,000kg of livestock to sustain/hectare while they grow meat (yes), bone, milk or wool.
I love meat but I’m sure NZ could feed far more than 40m if we put a lot more plant protein into the mix.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

To do as you suggest would require a lot more diesel and a lot more herbicide, fungicide, insecticide etc.
Is that a good idea?

Reply
Share
  • 1
  • 0

Plants don’t fart like cows or bulls. I would rather have an environment with less farts personally, not to mention the other material.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

With a lot of people not able to afford to eat real meat these days, this substitute meat could be great alternative for many people, but only if it's cheaper. If it's not, then what's the point.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

the best burger in town is already plant based: velvet burger - animal rights

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

I must admit to being very curious to see what it tastes like.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

I guess their aim is to make it taste similar to meat. Most likely that is what it will taste like.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Judith Collins is the answer for hard working New Zealanders ! Labour wants to kill off thousands of cows to meet their false climate change fart tax bull !

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

We already have a Kiwi alternative - Sunfed Foods, making plant-based chicken. Available in stores and tastes pretty darn good. Have to get used to the differences in cooking time for food prep but it's delicious!

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.