John Banks

Obfuscation is a word that is being widely used about John Banks at the moment.

Political journalists, newspaper editorials and bloggers are roundly condemning the ACT Party leader for his alleged deviousness in his political fundraising and his response to the latest allegations about the Dotcom scandal.

The problem for the government is that John Key has been forced to partake in the obfuscation as well.
So much so, that Andrea Vance is calling the prime minister the Master of Keyvasive action. Vance sums up Key’s orientation to the Banks saga: ‘See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. And in John Key's case, read no evil’.
And Key’s inclination to obfuscate on the issue meant that the prime minister’s press conference, according to Vance, ‘was torturous and frustrating’.
She also goes through the various measures that Key is employing in his attempt to keep Banks on as a minister. These include ‘resolutely refusing to take a look at the 126-page dossier from the police investigation’ so he can’t comment on it, and he has left it to his staff to talk to Banks, so he can’t comment on what Banks has told him.
Vance also sees the government’s announcement of proposed law changes as a cynical attempt to deflect: ‘This allows Mr Key to answer any uncomfortable questions about Mr Banks' behaviour by criticising the law’.
But perhaps Vance’s most cutting observation is that John Key seems only worried about whether Banks has misled him personally – and seemingly has no concerns about whether he has misled the public.
More obfuscation is coming from the ACT Party, with the president also conveniently refusing to read the Police report into their leader – see Claire Trevett’s Act sticks by Banks - for now. Apparently, the president regards the issue as a mere ‘political sideshow’.
Trevett’s article also draws parallels between Key’s defence of Banks and Helen Clark’s 2008 defence of Winston Peters during the so-called Glenngate political financing scandal.
An inconsistency – or perhaps hypocrisy – is suggested because Key used that occasion to campaign hard against the then prime minister’s obfuscation and protection of Winston Peters, but now simply regards that as a different situation.
That the tide seems to have well and truly turned against John Banks is evidenced by criticial newspaper editorials. The Press editorial today is particularly strong, suggesting that Key and National will soon start to suffer from their protection of a politician that the public has overwhelmingly recongised as dodgy. There is a clear message to John Key: Cut him loose.
The editorial also condemns the ‘hair-splitting justification’ going on. Similarly, a recent Dominion Post editorial concludes, ‘Banks has now lost all credibility and Mr Key's will be steadily eroded the longer he stands by him’ – see: Obfuscation makes Banks a liability.  
The focus on Banks’ Auckland mayoral campaign fundraising highlighted the bigger issue of the electoral system used in the supercity.
Brian Rudman has written a very thoughtful column taking the incumbent to task for the suggestion that his challengers should have a reduced campaign spending limit – see: Mayoralty race a rich man's sport.
Rudman also makes some very interesting arguments in favour of an Auckland Parliament instead of an elected mayor and council.
Other important or interesting political items today include:
Tristram Clayton’s Campbell Live item on school lunches is a must view. The images comparing the food available to decile 10 school students and those from a decile 1 school are both compelling and disturbing, no matter what your politics or views on poverty and welfare. The contrast also goes some way to explaining why many middle class New Zealanders have difficulty seeing the problem that professionals on the frontline have identified – see: Lunchbox differences in decile 1 and decile 10 schools.
Gordon Campbell has produced a thorough deconstruction and refutation of John Armstrong’s weekend column labeling him (and myself) as a ‘blogging parasite’ – see: On journalism, and John Armstrong. Russell Brown has weighed in with a similarly thoughtful and critical piece – see: Tired and emotional, for reals. The bloggers versus the mainstream media element of John Armstrong’s weekend critique is taken up by TVNZ’s Damian Christie in Bloggers: Pr*cks, Ars*holes, B*st*rds and C*nts. He puts forward some good reasons why journalists might want to throw some nasty names around about bloggers, but ultimately concludes: ‘Having a bitch about bloggers criticising your work is like a dinosaur sitting in a swamp whinging about the oncoming meteorite. Much as you might want to, you can’t stop it. It ain’t going away. Time to adapt’.
It might seem strange to hear it, but a government of the right is talking about nationalisation – see Danya Levy’s Government could nationalise water – Key. Meanwhile, the Maori Party is repeating claims that it got an assurance from John Key that he would not do any such thing – see Tracy Watkins’ Maori Party backs king's water claim
Joshua Hitchcock at Maori Law and Poltiics has a legal warning for both the government and iwi over the consultation process: “Shares-Plus” Consultation Pro-forma and Tainui boycott recent case law.
A recent trial and an ongoing Serious Fraud Ofiice investigation into the Wellington Tenths Trust has led the Dominion Post to reveal some eye-watering-sized consultancy fees being proposed for the sale of the Wellington Railway station – see Hamish Rutherford and Tim Donoghue’s Plan to sell railway station for casinoDavid Farrar comments ‘I see Barry Hart got struck off for over-charging his clients by a few thousand. He obviously did not think big enough.
It is roughly twice as dangerous to work in New Zealand as in Australia and almost four times as dangerous as working in Britain – see Rob Stock’s Shocking work death toll revealed in report
The solutions being suggested to counter the loss of jobs and encourage exporters have been tried and have failed before, writes Richard Long in There's no going back to the 70s.
Hone Harawira's “house nigger” comment has undone much of his good work since being re-elected last November, says Willie Jackson – see: Hone Harawira's mistake.
Allowing local democracy to flourish and make the big decisions about Christchurch’s rebuild would have built support rather than the opposition we are currently seeing, argues Chris Trotter in Christchurch rebuild needed a local solution.
Every year the Bruce Jesson Foundation, in conjunction with the University of Auckland, hosts a lecture by a prominent leftwing intellectual. This year, it’s investigative journalist Nicky Hager – speaking at the University on October 31 – see: Nicky Hager to deliver 2012 Bruce Jesson Lecture
Bryce Edwards


Today’s content

Banks Dotcom
Andrea Vance (Stuff): Master of Keyvasive action
Claire Trevett (Herald): Act sticks by Banks - for now
Brian Rudman (Herald): Mayoralty race a rich man's sport
Dave Armstrong (Stuff): The one when the taniwha got Banksie
The Press: Editorial – Cut him loose
Dom Post: Editorial – Obfuscation makes Banks a liability
Cameron Slater (Whaleoil): Why John Key can’t/won’t sack Banksie
Q+A interviews with Key and Shearer
Danyl Mclauchlan (Dim Post): The muddy mouths of baboons and sows
John Armstrong critique
Gordon Campbell (Scoop): On journalism, and John Armstrong
Russell Brown (Public Address): Tired and emotional, for reals
Ideologically Impure: More on Armstrong
Damian Christie (Public Address): Bloggers: Pr*cks, Ars*holes, B*st*rds and C*nts
The Standard: My 2 cents
Water claims and asset sales
Adam Bennett (Herald): Hapu see little point in water hui
Peter Wilson (Newswire): Bleak prospects for agreement with iwi
Tracy Watkins (Stuff): Maori Party backs king's water claim
Joshua Hitchcock (Maori Law and Poltiics): “Shares-Plus” Consultation
No Right Turn: So much for good faith II
Waikato Times: Editorial - Claims cause for unease
Willie Jackson (Auckland Now): Hone Harawira's mistake
Michelle A’Court (Stuff): Minister should make time for buggerising
Sam Sachdeva and Joelle Dally (Stuff): Protest at schools reform as fears grow for national roll-out
Kate Shuttleworth (Herald): Maori schools fight merger
Benefit reform and child poverty
Simon Collins (Herald): 'One strike' rule for beneficiaries
Southland Times: Editorial: Feed the kids breakfast
Danyl Mclauchlan (Dim Post): A footnote to the first draft
Phil O'Reilly (Herald): Child poverty affects us all
Richard Long (Dom Post): There's no going back to the 70s
Peter Conway (Dom Post): Inequality is now at its highest level
Alanah Eriksen (Herald): Name changes anger MP
Yvonne Tahana (Herald): War of words over Maori wardens
Hamish Rutherford and Tim Donoghue (Stuff): Plan to sell railway station for casino
Matthew Dearnaley (Herald): Port secrecy fuels Labour law bid
Audrey Young (Herald): Drug lobbyist attacks Pharmac
Sue Kedgley (Dom Post): It's no wonder we don't trust MPs
Mark Blackham (BlacklandPR): Political slate wk/ Sept 14 2012

5 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

Post Comment

5 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

This is all a Labour Party driven political beat up, aided and abetted by Kim Dotcom - a convicted fraudster, awating extradition to the USA to case serious criminal charges. Clearly Dotcom thought he was buying John Banks when he donated to Banks's Auckland mayoralty campaign more than two years ago. When he found out Banks couldn't be bought, particularly after he won Epsom in the general election in 2011 and became a Government Minister, Dotcom turned nasty. This has nothing to do with ACT or John Banks as an MP or a Minister. He wasn't member of ACT, an MP, or a Minister when he ran for Mayor of Auckland.

  • 0
  • 0

Your transparent and feeble attempt to divert the attention from Banks' disgraceful behaviour is about as convincing as Banks mantra "nothing to fear, nothing to hide"
Someone pass me the fly-spray please.

  • 0
  • 0

What has Act or MP got to do with what has happened? This is about the integrity and truthfulness of John Banks as a man.

Well, an honorable man he is not - he cannot answer a simple question without being deceitful of the truth. Why did he try to hide his association with Kim Dotcom? Guilty as sin.

Everything else is irrelevant - he should not have allowed himself to be in the company of Kim Dotcom.

  • 0
  • 0

I agree Lindsay, but what I do not understand is that, to me, it is obvious from dotcoms statements that the payments were made in the belief that they,(the payments) would earn him (dotcom) political favours? I thought it was illegal to attempt to bribe a public servant? Am I wrong? If I'm not then why hasn't the kraut been charged?
With tears in my eyes and my hands wringing I implore, beseech, and demand we should be told!! Pleeeease

  • 0
  • 0

Lrt the epsom voters have the say .No to 2014 for mr banks

  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot


Sym Price Change
USD 0.7327 0.0030 0.41%
AUD 0.9211 0.0007 0.08%
EUR 0.6140 0.0029 0.47%
GBP 0.5434 0.0060 1.12%
HKD 5.7285 0.0334 0.59%
JPY 82.1000 0.0490 0.06%


Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1293.3 2.700 2017-09-22T00:
Oil Brent 56.4 0.330 2017-09-22T00:
Oil Nymex 50.7 0.110 2017-09-22T00:
Silver Index 16.9 -0.040 2017-09-22T00:


Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 7795.4 7814.8 7795.4 0.25%
NASDAQ 6401.4 6429.5 6422.7 0.07%
DAX 12569.7 12646.6 12600.0 -0.06%
DJI 22334.1 22364.3 22359.2 -0.04%
FTSE 7263.9 7320.3 7263.9 0.64%
HKSE 27949.8 27960.9 28110.3 -0.82%
NI225 20413.6 20417.1 20347.5 -0.25%
ASX 5655.4 5688.2 5655.4 0.47%