Recently my partner and I sat down to watch the Lego movie; a thoroughly entertaining laugh-a-minute watch, typical of the style of today’s animated films that somehow manage to pitch the tone and humour at both adults and children alike.
For my partner, who grew up with Lego and can make incredible creations with a thousand tiny colourful pieces (biased as I am) it was a journey of reminiscence. But the story resonated for me too, despite a childhood devoid of Lego. Not only was it part filmed in ‘Middle Zealand’ but think tanks got a special mention worthy of a chuckle.
And while it was light hearted it also got us thinking on a deeper level about society, business and government control. The movie’s hero works as a builder who follows Lego instruction manuals to construct pre-designed objects. The ‘man upstairs’, aptly named President Business, achieves perfect social order by ensuring they follow these instructions. But soon the people start to fight back for control over their own lives. They want to make their own creations from the pieces of Lego. They want to be creative, deconstructing and reconstructing their own worlds, experimenting, creating, failing, and trying again.
However, what was both amusing but questionable in the movie was the way think tanks were portrayed. President Business lives in a lair constructed of pieces of red and black, which includes a ‘think tank’ that sucks the ideas out of people’s minds.
What’s ironic about this is that think tanks typically advocate for policies that liberate people from the shackles of a paternalistic government, and encourage creativity. They want to encourage power to the people – allowing people to live their own lives, to create their own businesses, to thrive and be free.
In other words, think tanks don’t want people to be forced to follow an instruction manual.
Yes, that might mean the world is more chaotic and unpredictable, but perfect social order designed from above is difficult to attain. And suppressing human creativity will lead to revolt, or at least people voting for a different party.
And while President Business was more of a business person than a politician, he had a monopoly over all consumer products, hardly something a think tank would advocate. Certainly not The New Zealand Initiative anyway.
The latest Lego product is the Evil Lair, think tank included. It’s amusing, but I do hope that the kids playing with this Lego set, who are likely to grow up to be creative adults, come to question this dogma: are think tanks really the bad guys?
Rose Patterson is the Research Fellow of the New Zealand Initiative
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
- Rocket Lab has lift-off, but doesn't make it to orbit
- Budget 2017 at a glance
- Crimson Consulting scholarship for Maori could be better, says Fox
- Kiwi business traveller stranded in San Francisco after United de-planes his wallet and passport
- Budget 2017: Mental health at centre of government’s $321m social investment package
Most listened to
- NBR's Rob Hosking with budget analysis. No lolly scramble but sweeteners aplenty
- Grant Thornton tax partner Murray Brewer with his take on the tax package
- NBR’s Calida Smylie talks to CTU policy head Bill Rosenberg in the Budget 2017 lock up
- OMF Financial’s Nigel Brunel discusses the economic implications of the Budget
- MetroGlass CEO Nigel Rigby on the outlook and market share position
- David Seymour gives Gareth Morgan a serve as the latest political party donations are disclosed
- NBR Radio: best of the week ended May 19, with Grant Walker