When the blueprint for the future Christchurch was announced with great fanfare by Gerry Brownlee, the minister of all things ground shaking, back in August, much made of the fact there were a handful of key projects of strategic importance in the rebuild.
These projects included the convention center, the stadium, the sports center etc.
Zoned for acquisition
We have the dubious distinction that our commercial property (read it’s sorry tale here) is situated within the precinct penciled down for the new stadium.
We resigned ourselves to the fact that our land would be lost to us, but were buoyed by the stated intention to quickly and fairly manage the land acquisition process and were happy that the body tasked with managing the process, CCDU (Christchurch Central Development Unit), was making comments about potential land swaps for effected parties. We dutifully gave CCDU all the required information about our property within the week of the announcement of the blueprint. And then we waited. And waited.
It’s taken three months and this week we received notification that the Crown has obtained a valuation on our land and that valuation would mark the starting point for a negotiation about land purchase. We raised the potential of a land swap and where told that there was virtually zero chance of this occurring and the mention of this when the blueprint announced was something of a “pipedream”.
First some context. Our land has a Government valuation of $480 per square meter. This dates back to 2007 and obviously in the years since, land prices have appreciated markedly. Add to this the fact that immediately following the announcement of the blueprint, and the fact that it included a huge reduction in buildable land, that basic economics created a reduced supply/increased demand loop and that land prices have risen correspondingly. Therefore one would expect that valuations would take this into account, and that the price offered would, to a greater or lesser extent, allow landowners to replace their lost land with something comparable.
Alas not, the Crown’s assessment, based on a allegedly thorough valuation, was set at $433 per meter - less than the value back in 2007. Far less than the price for comparable properties selling in the current market and, most importantly, less than we’re going to have to spend to get a replacement piece of land anywhere similar.
But here’s where it gets interesting. The Crown contracted valuers Colliers and Telfer Young to perform all the valuations. As would be expected, we requested from CCDU’s agent a copy of the valuation. Strangely we were told that:
Unfortunately we are not allowed to hand out the Crown valuations. The reasoning behind this is that we have made an offer at market value (based on the Crowns valuation) and it is up to the property owners to provide evidence contrary to that of the crown if they disagree
This is highly unusual – in usual negotiations, be they rental or buy and sell ones, both parties have access to valuations and hence negotiations can happen in an open and transparent manner. In this case that is not the process and the Crown, despite its stated intention to act fairly, honorably and flexibly with landowners, would seem to be taking the role of commercially-driven land banker, while at the same time sheltering under the protection of an unprecedented piece of legislation which puts all the power in their hands.
I discussed this fact with some independent valuers working in the Christchurch market and was told that the rumor among them was that the independent valuations the Crown has obtained are actually higher than the offers being presented, and that the Crown is going in with low offers to give itself some negotiating room. No one would go on-record saying this, people are shaking in fear at the power that CCDU and CERA are wielding in this city. What we have here then is a situation where the crown is demonstrably acting in a prejudicial manner that is designed to minimize the amount they have to pay for land. In other words, the Crown is using subterfuge to duplicitously rob land owners of fair value for their land, and in doing so, is furthering its intention to make an economic windfall from the future sale of acquired land.
There’s another aspect to all of this and that is the suggestion that the Crown is intending to acquire land, ostensibly with the aim of most effectively ensuring the consistent and coherent rebuild of the city but that in fact it is finding ways to roll up land at an artificially deflated price and to later sell that land at inflated prices.
Under the terms of the Public Works Act, affected landowners must be offered first right of refusal to re-acquire the land should the stated project go ahead. There is no clarity as to whether this will occur in this event – CCDU has been largely silent on this first-right of refusal in the event that the stated projects don’t occur and this increases the perception amongst landowners that this is an opportunistic way for the Crown to profit at the expense of those in Christchurch who have already suffered so much over the past couple of years.
Alas, yet again, it would seem that something is rotten in the state of Christchurch.
Ben Kepes blogs at Diversity.net.nz
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
- Regional economic development, job creation and immigration key priorities for the Coalition
- What's in the Labour/NZ First agreement for businesses? Not much, so far
- Rent-to-buy to become part of KiwiBuild under Greens-Labour confidence and supply agreement
- English: I’m not going anywhere
- Ardern: new government will follow Labour's immigration policy, not NZ First's
Most listened to
- Lewis Road ceo Peter Cullinane says Southern Pastures was the best fit of potential investors they spoke to
- Telecommunications Users Association's Craig Young says Vocus are getting ready for a familiar experience, getting sold
- Labour leader Jacinda Ardern and NZ First leader Winston Peters discuss their foreign ownership plans
- Rodney Hide, unlike the public, is unsurprised at the insanity of politics
- Jacqueline Rowarth on how food production advances have influenced our consumption habits
- NBR Radio: The best interviews, with Grant Walker — updated daily