PRIVATE BIN: Hooray for a smart judge

When the law is an ass, Chief Justice Sian Elias is, it seems, not afraid of saying so.

Under the Resource Management Act, local authorities considering an application for discharge of greenhouse gases are prohibited from considering the effect of the emissions on climate change “except to the extent that the use and development of renewable energy enables a reduction in discharge into the air of greenhouse gases.”

In plain English that means that a party that wishes to produce non-renewable energy can ignore the effects on climate change, whereas parties that wish to produce the far more desirable renewable energy may be have their plans challenged.

Chief Justice Elias thinks that’s silly, and anyone with half a brain would agree.

The issue arose when the Supreme Court was considering an application by Genesis Energy to discharge greenhouse gases from its planned gas-fired power station near Helensville, north of Auckland.

Like the Court of Appeal before it, the Supreme Court said by a four-to-one majority that the exception applied only to applications for renewable energy production, not non-renewable energy as in Genesis’ case.

Dissenting from her fellow Justices, Justice Elias said that in her view the intent of the law was that the greenhouse gas matter should apply equally to applications for non-renewable and renewable energy production.

Don’t we all love a judge who realises when the wording of the law has got something fundamentally wrong and has the guts to say so.

Only problem is that her four colleagues on the bench upheld the law to the letter so Genesis doesn’t have to worry about the climate change matter.

4 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

Post Comment

4 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

And that's why the citizens are rapidly losing their tolerance and patience with the pollies the civil servants and the Courts. Until these people wake up and realise they are there to serve the people and not them selves we will continue to pour scorn on them and laugh in their faces.

Jutsice Elias deserves our admiration as one who is able to recognise common sense and distinguish herself as above the usual low standard of govenrance we suffer under.

  • 0
  • 0

This is just another example of incompetence in those who were making the laws at the time. The judge is simply there to uphold the law, whether they agree with it or not is irrelevant.

Hopefully we now have some more competence in law making in Wellington.

  • 0
  • 0

A judge is called upon to interpret the law as it is written, not to reinterpret based on what they thought it should say. If the politicians and the public don't like the outcome, it is then a requirement of the politicians to rewrite the law.

  • 0
  • 0

I fully agree with Billman. While I have no problems with the CJ commenting that she thinks the law does not make sense,I think she erred in making a finding in this case on what she believed should be the law rather than on what the law actually is.

  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot


Sym Price Change
USD 0.6952 0.0000 0.00%
AUD 0.8901 0.0000 0.00%
EUR 0.5907 0.0000 0.00%
GBP 0.5276 0.0000 0.00%
HKD 5.4294 0.0000 0.00%
JPY 78.9230 0.0000 0.00%


Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1278.6 -9.430 2017-10-20T00:
Oil Brent 57.8 0.550 2017-10-20T00:
Oil Nymex 51.9 0.580 2017-10-20T00:
Silver Index 17.0 -0.177 2017-10-20T00:


Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 8124.1 8142.3 8124.1 0.07%
NASDAQ 6633.4 6640.0 6605.1 0.36%
DAX 13057.8 13063.6 12990.1 0.01%
DJI 23205.2 23328.8 23163.0 0.71%
FTSE 7523.0 7560.0 7523.0 0.00%
HKSE 28360.0 28519.8 28159.1 1.17%
NI225 21391.0 21489.3 21448.5 0.04%
ASX 5896.1 5924.9 5896.1 0.17%