Researchers seek sports sponsorship bans

Public health researchers from the University of Otago say up to a third of sports sponsorships by food and drink companies should be replaced in the way tobacco was.

The authors reviewed the websites of 308 New Zealand sports organisations covering 58 sports to identify sponsors and conducted 18 interviews with key administrators. A quarter of websites had links to sponsors.

Sponsors were classified as healthy or unhealthy using the New Zealand Food and Beverage Classification System nutrient criteria for energy, fat, salt and fibre levels. The study found that a third of food/beverage companies sponsoring sport could be classified as unhealthy.

“Such sponsorship is likely to promote consumption of junk food and dilutes government recommendations promoting healthy eating”, says Associate Professor Louise Signal of Otago’s health promotion and policy research unit.

“McDonald's and Coke are the greatest product sponsors, just like at the London Olympics,” she notes. “And one of our most popular sports, rugby, has the unhealthiest sponsorship by far with 23% of brands and logos linked to unhealthy food. In contrast, netball has only 1% linked to unhealthy food.”

Dr Signal says this is of considerable concern given the increase of obesity in children. Currently, 11% of children aged 5-14 are obese, up from 8% in 2006/7, and at least 20% are overweight.

The university announcement says consumption of junk food is a significant contributor to this problem and that obesity is associated with a range of health problems, including childhood diabetes and heart disease, diabetes and cancer in later life.

“Our children deserve to be protected from the pressure to eat junk food while enjoying healthy outdoor activity, and parents need to be supported against pester advertising in their efforts to promote healthy eating to their children,” Dr Signal says.

The study also found that some sponsors continued to target children with additional marketing activities. This is also developed through access to regional clubs and youth players providing them with product samples, merchandise and vouchers for purchasing more product.

“Counting logos does not capture the extent of marketing in sports and probably underestimates the extent of sponsorship,” the researchers say.

“Tactics included the use of Player of the Day certificates for budding All White football players as young as four, and promotion of Powerade by the All Blacks. Powerade is not generally recommended for children,” Dr Signal says.

The study found healthy food and beverage brands also sponsor sport, with rugby again coming out on top with 21% of logos linked to healthy foods and cricket next highest at 5%.

Increasing such healthy sponsorship is a way to support children eating a healthy diet, the researchers say, and has been shown to have an impact. High participation rates in sport and increasing recognition of how diet benefits athletic performance suggest sports settings are ideal locations for promoting healthy eating.

All sports administrators identified the main benefit of sponsorship as financial. Although many report sports organisations felt concerned about associating themselves with unhealthy foods or beverages, others consider sponsorship income more important than what type of food is being promoted.

Recommendations include sports codes requiring members to place a higher priority on health when selecting sponsors, and government regulation and funding to replace unhealthy food sponsorship with healthy sponsorship, just as for tobacco.

The recently created Health Promotion Agency is responsible for tobacco sponsorship replacement in sport. It will be a logical step to include replacement of junk food sponsorship in their mandate, the study concludes.

4 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

Post Comment

4 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

So where is all this funding from tobacco sponsorship replacement in sport and when will this funding flow down to grassroots sport in the Community. My bet is that it never will and more financial pressure will be put on clubs in sport with less funding. Keep the Academics out of sport.
Maybe some of their research funding would be better spent on kids sport.

  • 0
  • 0

I agree with Stephen. The issue here is what the poor (literially) sports clubs do without money or where they replace this from. When the tobacco sponsorship was withdrawn the government replaced this with the smoke-free sponsorship, but my understanding this was no where near as beneficial.
In terms of the Macca's and Coke sponsorships of sports, I actually think this is a benefical thing getting people involved in sports as well as the "balanced lifestyle" programme these organisations now promote. Do we go back to the pokies and community trusts which continue to prove they are one of the most shady enterprises in New Zealand? Is that better than Macca's or Coke?

  • 0
  • 0

Sports funding brings dubious benefits, it any at all. It makes those with little else in their life to feel successful when their team is, but that's about it. For the most part, it encourages violence, aggression and win at all costs.

If we spent the same money on the arts as we did on sports, NZ would be a better place.

  • 0
  • 0

"If we spent the same money on the arts as we did on sports, NZ would be a better place." - Rastus

To paraphrase Sean Hughes, if Kiwis spent as much time studying and discussing how to understand their financial situation and financial markets with the level of passion as they do, say, with the All Blacks we'd be all be in a much better place.

  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot


Sym Price Change
USD 0.7165 -0.0017 -0.24%
AUD 0.9145 -0.0015 -0.16%
EUR 0.6087 -0.0005 -0.08%
GBP 0.5415 -0.0007 -0.13%
HKD 5.5974 -0.0099 -0.18%
JPY 80.3660 -0.2210 -0.27%


Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1301.2 -8.600 2017-10-16T00:
Oil Brent 57.6 0.670 2017-10-16T00:
Oil Nymex 52.1 0.420 2017-10-16T00:
Silver Index 17.3 -0.071 2017-10-16T00:


Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 8090.7 8094.6 8090.7 -0.07%
NASDAQ 6622.6 6632.5 6605.8 0.28%
DAX 13017.2 13026.5 12991.9 0.09%
DJI 22892.9 22960.1 22871.7 0.37%
FTSE 7535.4 7557.0 7535.4 -0.11%
HKSE 28777.2 28777.2 28692.8 0.05%
NI225 21352.2 21394.0 21255.6 0.15%
ASX 5846.8 5894.9 5846.8 0.71%