The Moxie Sessions: Innovating on the inside - how big businesses are acting like startups

Opinion

Vaughn Davis

Ed Hyde

Some of the world’s most successful tech companies famously started in garages. But can that same sort of innovation happen in boardrooms, or at least in the multi-level office towers they sit on top of?

A growing number of big companies in New Zealand and around the world are investing in sidelines, startups and spinoffs. So why do they do it, and is it working?

Regular readers will already have concluded that this is a question best answered by a Moxie Sessions discussion, and that’s exactly what happened recently at Auckland startup space GridAKL. Leading the conversation were James Hurman of innovation consultancy Previously Unavailable, Louise Webster from the New Zealand Innovation Council, Datacom’s Kerry Topp and Spark Ventures CEO Ed Hyde.

James Hurman has made something of a study of innovation in New Zealand recently, and the news isn’t good. His report, Big I, little i, surveyed 44 CEOs of big companies and successful startups and found almost universal commitment at executive and board level to innovation and R&D. The only problem is that, according to the Productivity Commission, our innovation outputs nationally are going backwards.

One solution, for larger companies at least, might lie in the approach taken by Coca Cola. James describes a programme where the company briefs its toughest problems to the entrepreneur community, then invests in companies that come up with solutions. When Coke’s traditional distribution system wasn’t keeping up with small retailer out-of-stocks (and costing the company $1 billion annually in lost sales), they found a solution in a startup called Wonolo. Instead of relying on trucks and warehouses, the platform pays students to collect stock from retailers with a surplus and deliver it to others who’ve run out.

Louise Webster of the New Zealand Innovation Council has seen both sides of the picture; both as someone working in a small startup, and now (since the Council was sold to KPMG) working inside a large company. Louise sees opportunities in big companies taking the acquisition path, but there are downsides.

On the plus side, there is no shortage of businesses to buy. New Zealand has more than 368,000 small to medium enterprises, with 84% of those turning over less than $5 million. Many of those, Louise says, provide a ready-made product and service innovation pipeline.

The big gotcha she says, is not innovation but culture. Successful acquisitions rely on a good match between the way the companies think and operate, and a willingness on the part of the buyer to adapt and change. If this doesn’t happen, Louise says, the bigger company’s “immune system” springs into action… working in subtle and not-so-subtle ways to reject the foreign organism.

By day, Kerry Topp works at IT services company Datacom. By night (well, by day as well) he chairs the Wynyard Innovation Neighbourhood – seven companies based near where we’re sitting tonight, all looking to collaborate and find opportunities for innovation. The Neighbourhood works by fostering “over the fence” (two companies) and “barbecue” (several companies) conversations between members. An unexpected challenge it faces, Kerry says, is finding quests – big problems that everyone can work together to solve, and ideally take the solution offshore.

One company with no shortage of big challenges is Spark, and part of its response has been to set up in-house innovation arm Spark Ventures. Recently-appointed CEO Ed Hyde says that like all telco businesses, the last 5-10 years have seen key markets stagnate or decline. Optimising legacy products will help address that, but will only go so far. Spark Ventures has created or invested in 10 businesses, and learned a few things along the way. The biggest successes, Ed says, have come where Spark Ventures has delivered similar products to its core business but in different ways, such as mobile brand Skinny and ISP Bigpipe. What hasn’t worked, he says, is holding onto an idea past its kill-by date. Market expectations mean it can be almost as hard to shut something down in a big company as it is to start something up.

As the discussion continues, it’s that gap between corporate expectations and startup culture that keeps coming up. On the one hand, the big end of town is under attack from disruptive technologies and looking for ways to move beyond legacy products and services. And on the other, they’re battling their own culture as they try to innovate.

  • Accept a high kill rate: don’t expect every venture to fly, and be prepared to kill the ones that don’t.
  • Don’t measure innovation with a corporate ruler: that internal startup might not be profitable this year (or ever!). That’s just how this stuff works.
  • Be prepared for antibodies: some parts of your company will welcome the new arrival and some parts won’t… rejection of the transplanted culture is a real risk.
  • Outsource problems and back winners: Coca-Cola’s approach presents a practical and effective alternative to the traditional “pitch circus” and could be a great model for larger New Zealand businesses.
  • Look for adjacencies: some of the most successful acquisitions and internal startups come from businesses close to your existing one… even if it’s tempting to go completely left field.

Footnote: since our session, Coca-Cola has pulled the pin on its startup incubator but continues to “imbed (sic) innovation across its functions and throughout its global Business Units.” 


8 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

Post Comment

8 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

The IT sector has done a good job in promoting themselves, and attracting funding, but have failed to deliver. Go past Xero and TradeMe and you very quickly get down to a lot of energy and talent being dispersed in ventures that will never go anywhere. For virtually every IT innovation, someone else in the world has the same innovation. Let's use IT as a tool, and get real products into the global market. Don't just see 'innovation' and 'start ups' as 'IT' words.
How's that for putting a cat amongst the pigeons!!!!

Reply
Share
  • 5
  • 0

Tony are you saying the Emperor has no clothes?

I would agree with you.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Xero needs to be treated as a deserving hero once it starts making money. Currently it is just a blue print for a wasteland of start ups who have spent all of their energy into wild valuations and raising money etc. It has probably done more harm than good.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

It's going to take a fundamental shift in the risk appetite of the average NZ early stage investor if we want to get real products off the ground. Most seem much happier chasing the instantly scalable nature of Saas offerings than backing hardware companies through the "valley of death".

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Some of us are giving it a go!

David Miller
Director
Times-7 Ltd

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Out-sourcing can work, or at least corporates can locate intrapreneurs outside the parent's 4 walls, and allow them the breathing space to develop their own momentum and culture.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Corporate venturing has been tried and failed both in NZ and offshore. From what I have seen nothing has changed in my view to make it any more successful. The biggest issue is that many of our larger corporates are too small on a global scale and arrogant - that is they think they are innovative when they are not.

But no doubt a lot of groups will be trying to sell their expertise to clients with more money than sense.

If I was a shareholder in any company going into venture I would be asking some serious questions of management.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

What exactly is Tech? I saw a new 'tech' company today. All they have done is change the shape of a gaming control and put existing 'tech' inside it. So is that really manufacturing

Industry and manufacturing will drive 'tech' as existing businesses work out and try and find better ways to do things

Government grants and incubators will not drive tech. This is proven as 99% of these companies dont make profits. This is because while their ideas are great and their products are shiny, actual business does not need them

Again, what is tech? Is a microwave tech? Is Xero still tech after 10 years or so? Tech becomes products, in main driven by a need

If the government spent more energy and money into start up physical manufacturing 'tech' would blossom like nothing else

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot

Forex

Sym Price Change
USD 0.7316 0.0052 0.72%
AUD 0.9131 0.0020 0.22%
EUR 0.6098 0.0025 0.41%
GBP 0.5410 0.0036 0.67%
HKD 5.7089 0.0312 0.55%
JPY 81.5440 0.5250 0.65%

Commods

Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1306.9 -12.570 2017-09-18T00:
Oil Brent 55.2 -0.180 2017-09-18T00:
Oil Nymex 50.4 -0.010 2017-09-18T00:
Silver Index 17.1 -0.545 2017-09-18T00:

Indices

Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 7758.7 7771.5 7758.7 0.08%
NASDAQ 6460.1 6477.8 6448.5 0.10%
DAX 12556.5 12566.2 12559.4 0.02%
DJI 22297.9 22355.6 22268.3 0.28%
FTSE 7253.3 7285.7 7253.3 0.30%
HKSE 28200.5 28248.1 28159.8 -0.38%
NI225 20128.2 20320.8 19909.5 1.96%
ASX 5720.6 5742.2 5720.6 -0.12%