Time to act on refugee crisis

POLITICAL ROUNDUP

Dr Bryce Edwards

Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull continues to deny requests from Jacinda Ardern to take some Manus Island refugees

The Prime Minister’s strategy for the Manus Island refugees is probably not sustainable. Jacinda Ardern’s preferred tactic is to continue with “talking” at the moment. She’s done this by engaging with Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and speaking out publicly at the Apec summit in Vietnam about the crisis. 

Some think this has proved ineffective, and more action is now needed by the New Zealand government. Others argue that all the talk has actually been harmful, and it’s time for the government to step back from damaging fights with New Zealand’s closest ally. So, what is the best course of action? 

Below are the arguments for the New Zealand government taking a stronger line. Tomorrow I’ll round up the case for New Zealand pulling back from a campaign that is raising the ire of the Australian government. 

The case for 'less talk, more action'
Peace activist Jessie Anne Dennis has put the case for stronger action by New Zealand, saying “Now it’s time to swap compassionate words for life-saving action. The situation for refugees on Manus Island is a humanitarian crisis. The New Zealand government’s response to this so far has been to recycle platitudes while doing as little as it can” – see: Words are cheap. Now Ardern must take real action to save the Manus Island refugees

Dennis argues for New Zealand to cut Australia out of the equation, and directly save the abandoned refugees: “We don’t need to ask Australia’s permission to help these people. Australia has all but abandoned these people after illegally detaining them for years in conditions amounting to torture. New Zealand can bring some sanity back to this situation by helping these people now. The new government likes to talk a lot about compassion and kindness. But what they have done in the last few days is repeat a cynical deal that John Key made with Julia Gillard in 2013.”

Similarly, Damon Rusden says this should be Ardern’s “time to shine and walk the talk” – see: The politics of principle

A number of prominent Australians are now calling for New Zealand to take stronger action over the Manus Island refugee crisis. These individuals also want our government to intervene directly, bypassing Australia and working with Papua New Guinea and the UN – see the Herald’s Leading Aussies plea with PM Jacinda Ardern to save Manus refugees. Signatories to this open letter include “former ministers, heads of state departments, a former chief justice, professors, barristers, and refugee and surgeon Munjed Al Muderis”.

Refugee advocates and politicians in Papua New Guinea are asking New Zealand to intervene. This is explained in depth, in Eleanor Ainge Roy’s Guardian newspaper article, Manus Island: New Zealand urged to bypass Australia to resolve refugee crisis. In this, a representative of the Refugee Council for New Zealand asserts that this country has a “humanitarian obligation” to go directly to Papua New Guinea. 

The chief executive of the Asylum Seekers Support Trust in Auckland is quoted saying, “We are a wealthy country, we can find that support if we really need to and this is a crisis, so it would be good to see New Zealand step in and show its humanitarian colours … I think the New Zealand government has made all the right noises. It is a very quick test of whether they are prepared to put their money where their mouth is. I have hope that they will do more.”

Blogger No Right Turn has been particularly critical of the lack of progress on the Manus Island situation. Following Ms Ardern’s first trip to Australia, he accused the prime minister of Rolling over for Australia. He was especially troubled by Ardern’s justification for not taking stronger action due to Malcolm Turnbull’s claim to be considering New Zealand’s offer to take 150 refugees while also dealing with Trump. 

The blogger pointed out the problem with this: “Australia isn't ‘actively considering’ anything. Instead, it is literally trying to starve refugees to death to force them to give up their claims. Donald Trump is not going to rescue Australia's victims. So we have to. And if that means going around Australia and negotiating directly with PNG, then so be it – because people are going to die if we don't. That's what's at stake here. A leader with a clear moral vision would see that. Instead, Ardern is giving us mealy-mouthed bullshit. So much for her and her government's principles.”

Following on from this, he blogged that there are no barriers to New Zealand going directly to Papua New Guinea over the crisis: “The good news is that, in theory (and explicitly in Papua New Guinea, because they Are Not Being Detained), the refugees are free to leave to any country which wishes to take them. We should call Australia on that. And if they don't like us offering a new home to 150 people, then we should offer one to 500” – see: Bring them here. See his latest post, We need to do more than this

Can New Zealand take more refugees?
Many are now calling for New Zealand to do more generally about refugees, especially given the international scale of the problem. Today University of Otago political scientist Vicki Spencer writes in the Otago Daily Times that New Zealand’s refugee policy is not necessarily more progressive than Australia’s: “Our inaction contributes to the suffering of refugees, as do the governments they are fleeing from. So let's not fool ourselves. The cruelty underpinning Australia's detention policy is just as evident in New Zealand's refugee quota. Both exacerbate the pain when we can do better” – see: NZ should take more refugees

Spencer points out that New Zealand’s refugee quota – even with announced extensions – compares very poorly to the number of refugees taken by countries like Australia: In New Zealand, the ratio of refugees is 0.02% of New Zealand's population, and in Australia it’s 0.07%.

And today, academics Sharon Harvey and Sorowar Chowdhury suggests New Zealand should help those people being pushed out of Myanmar – see: NZ urgently needs to take more Rohingya refugees

Some of the arguments against accepting more refugees are dealt with by the head of Amnesty International New Zealand, Grant Bayldon – see: Seeking asylum is a legal right. Could somebody tell Mike Hosking?

Will New Zealand intervene in Manus Island?
New Zealand’s prime minister has said it’s preferable to deal with Australia over the Manus Island refugees, rather than Papua New Guinea. Vernon Small explains that “Australia had done the initial screening of the refugees” and therefore Ms Ardern says going directly to Papua New Guinea would not "add any haste to the issue" – see: Jacinda Ardern steps up pressure on Malcolm Turnbull over refugee offer

Instead, the New Zealand government has decided to donate money to help deal with the situation in the meantime – see Vernon Small’s NZ to give $3m to help Manus Island refugees, PM claims progress on offer

Ardern has publicised her attempts to continue to pressure the Australian government. She has said that she has been seeking a “substantive" meeting with Malcolm Turnbull to follow up on New Zealand’s offer. And while in Asia, Ardern definitely had some sort of meeting in “passing" but it’s still not clear how “substantive" this was, with journalists reporting that “Ardern has been given the brush-off” – see Audrey Young and Derek Cheng’s Ardern snubbed by Aussie PM over Manus Island talks

Some argue that by going down the path of having more talks and negotiations with Australia, New Zealand might actually get a worse deal. Patrick Gower has reported that by letting the US choose the refugees it wants to take, New Zealand will be left with the remainder: “New Zealand believes the US will take 'higher quality' refugees off Manus first, leaving New Zealand with poorer quality. It's believed that the need is urgent and should be done now” – see: Revealed: The Manus Island refugee deal that Ardern has offered Turnbull

Furthermore, New Zealand’s talks with Mr Turnbull appear to have resulted in Ardern agreeing that any Manus Island refugees taken by New Zealand would be banned from being able to travel to Australia. Gower reports that “This has previously been resisted, with official concerns that it would create a small group of ‘second-class citizens’ in New Zealand who don't enjoy free access to Australia.”

Finally, to see what former refugees settled in New Zealand think about the current situation, see Abbas Nazari’s As a Tampa refugee, I have seen first-hand the impact when NZ takes moral leadership, and Aziz Al-Sa'afin’s Manus Island is all of our shame to bear


17 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

Post Comment

17 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

These are not refugees, they are economic opportunists and this situation has no resemblance to the plight of the Tampa refugees, and no we should not be taking anyone from Manus Island, the only proper channel has an abundance of woman and children waiting to be rescued, these should be considered before any unaccompanied men who queue jumped by paying smugglers.

Reply
Share
  • 3
  • 0

Indeed, as interviews with people who have worked there point out, they are not refugees. They are criminals whom have got to where they are by smugglers and deception. The fact that most media and left wing politicians ignore this says a lot.

Reply
Share
  • 3
  • 0

Totally agree. The whole purpose of shipping them off to PNG was so that the word would get back that it was not smart to pay people smugglers. It's working, the only fly in the ointment being our PM acting as a petulant university student, full of theory and no real understanding.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Too right. Not one of them should be allowed in.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Thank goodness Malcolm Turnbull and Peter Dutton appear to have New Zealand's best interests at heart! As my hubby just said, "...it's obvious Jacinda, James & Winston, couldn't care less what the vast majority of taxpaying citizens in this country think, or want" :(

Reply
Share
  • 4
  • 1

Once you let that lot in it will become a tidal wave, thousands will arrive by any means possible, and what sort of defense do we have,our air force,ie tiger moths,our navy frigates that wouldn't be ready,or in port for maintenance,gods knows what would happen,can't help but laugh,it be an absolute shambles.

Reply
Share
  • 3
  • 1

You are so right Gary - especially when one looks at what has happened in certain other European cities, where they have allowed thousands of undesirables to cross their borders, prepared to welcome them as guests into their country. It's a scary prospect to think it may happen here.

And the question I have, is where is Winston Peters on this? He hasn't said boo on the matter. Looks to me all he does these days is hide behind Jacinda's skirt!!

Reply
Share
  • 3
  • 0

The collective wisdom would suggest we mind our own business.
We already have enough refugee in NZ and we have so called 30,000 under feed kids and homeless.
What in heavens name would we want with another 150 when we clearly are ignoring our own dramatic problems.
Ahdern needs to get her head out of the sand and take a good look around home base before she offers to finance Australia problems.
She is behaving like a kid in a lolli shop, handing out all and sundry to who ever will draw the biggest headline.
It is simple grand standing with no sense or reason while the walls fall in around her.
Her type don't last long before reality hits home and they show they can not go the pace.....she will certainly be one of those .
All I can say is there is trouble afoot.

Reply
Share
  • 2
  • 0

Supporting people traffickers in any way should be an offence. Trafficking is an illegal activity. That should include any governments accepting those who have paid traffickers for illegal services. Human traffickers are part of criminal gangs that also traffic young girls and boys for nefarious purposes for money. Many of their "clients" die and there is no transparency about what happened to them, drowning, sold as sex slaves, sold as slaves, murdered and so on. Anyone found supporting their illegal trade should be prosecuted.
And here we have Jacinda needling our Australian neighbours and sabotaging their hard-won and successful policy to thwart illegal human traffickers! I wouldn't be surprised if Australia starting requiring visas for Kiwi's travelling there as a punishment for our government's stupidity.
As for James Shaw and his "climate refugees", he should just go to Italy and stay there to show them how to live with their legions of illegal trafficked people.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

"climate refugees" i have never heard anything so stupid, .... and we are only a little way into this term

Reply
Share
  • 1
  • 0

Where's Winston on all of this? Or is he just polishing his baubles of office?

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

My hubby was just saying, "....and the next thing you know, Phillip Smith will get his wig back"

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Thank God Malcolm Turnbull and the Australians are saying no. Someone has to be the adult in the room and Jacinda certainly isn't being it.

Reply
Share
  • 1
  • 0

When are the next polls?

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Bug ger the polls, when is the next election..??!!

Reply
Share
  • 1
  • 0

It looks like it can't come soon enough, by the way this outfit is going to go.

Reply
Share
  • 1
  • 0

Before 9 months, enjoy the fiasco in the mean-time:)

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot

Forex

Sym Price Change
USD 0.6930 0.0022 0.32%
AUD 0.9197 0.0024 0.26%
EUR 0.5885 0.0019 0.32%
GBP 0.5193 0.0017 0.33%
HKD 5.4101 0.0171 0.32%
JPY 78.6310 0.2000 0.26%

Commods

Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1241.8 -3.820 2017-12-11T00:
Oil Brent 64.7 1.290 2017-12-11T00:
Oil Nymex 58.0 0.670 2017-12-11T00:
Silver Index 15.7 -0.038 2017-12-11T00:

Indices

Symbol Open High Last %
NASDAQ 6847.6 6879.8 6840.1 0.51%
DJI 24338.1 24389.7 24329.2 0.23%