Why it is important for NZ to participate in Rimpac exercises
Hawaii is perhaps best known for its many surfers, the blonde-haired, non-threatening and docile creatures comfortably living on the waves.
But this July and August larger and more deadly craft are skimming the waves around the holiday islands. The 23rd military exercise of the Rim of the Pacific (Rimpac) series is under way and the Royal New Zealand Navy is participating.
These multinational maritime manoeuvres are the world’s largest, with 21 countries invited to participate this year sailing everything from conventionally powered warships to the controversial-only-in-New-Zealand nuclear-powered variants.
Intriguingly, the United States plans for many of its ships to be powered by a 50/50 mixture of biofuel. The alternate energy was bought at the hefty price of $US12 million for 1.6 million litres, making it the largest single biofuel purchase in history.
The exercises are particularly important for the US as Washington cements its strategic shift toward the Pacific region. Interoperability and power projection are at the top of the agenda, with Russia making its debut entrance to the series.
Exercises will include mine clearance, disaster response, antisubmarine warfare and, of course, humanitarian relief.
Australia and New Zealand have been invited to previous Rimpac gatherings and it is just as important today as it has been in the past for both South Pacific nations to participate.
This is because both rely on maritime trade to maintain their standards of living. Neither country could function if those supply lines to the world markets were broken.
More than 75% of Australian exports and imports (by value) travel by sea. And New Zealand’s export market, especially its livestock and dairy industry, depends on the safe travel of shipping to deliver their goods to faraway cities.
The Australasian nations cannot guarantee the safety of these logistics with their own navies. The Royal New Zealand navy is small and equipped primarily to protect its territorial waters and cannot maintain long-term expeditionary missions.
While the Royal Australian navy is stronger in size and capability, and looking to increase its purchases of modern warships, it is nevertheless unable to project any real maritime power.
Throughout their history both nations have relied on a stronger naval power to guarantee their critical supply routes. In the 19th and early 20th centuries that patron country was Britain. British ships controlled the world’s strategic waterways and protected international shipping.
However, since World War II, when Britain essentially ceded control of the North Atlantic to the US in return for American assistance in fighting Axis powers, the pre-eminent global maritime power has been the United States Navy.
The US Navy patrols the world’s oceans every day of every year. Hundreds of millions of dollars are funnelled into the operation of extremely modern warships that can sail to any part of the globe within days.
It operates more aircraft carriers than all other countries combined and plans to build even more in the next few decades. In fact, a US carrier group is a centrepiece to the Rimpac exercises.
There are few things more intimidating than the sight of a US aircraft carrier sailing just offshore for a belligerent government. The presence of American naval patrols around the world, in flashpoints such as the South China Sea or the Korean peninsula, and in the world’s most critical shipping lanes, is not to be understated.
Without the guarantee of international passage that US warships provide the global market could probably not exist.
Perhaps the most enduring international relations success of the past 50 years is also the most difficult to spot. US warships that maintain the balance of power between nations and hold open transit lanes are an integral part of our world.
Without the United States Navy Japan, for one, would bolster its territorial navy, which is already one of the strongest in the world, to offset the growing strength of China’s increasingly capable navy.
If US ships did not patrol the Arabian Peninsula many of those nations would take their security into their own hands to counter the threat posed by a rising Iran.
The territorial disputes in the South China Sea is already heating up – removing the presence of American navy patrols would only accelerate fractures in the region.
Its global maritime pre-eminence prevents conflicts between states just as surely as it can conclude them. US warships now in Hawaii are part of a system that is just as humanitarian as the largest aid package.
The 21 nations attending Rimpac display the global dependence on American naval power and how incredibly important each country considers training with the US military.
Australia and New Zealand are participating in the exercises to ensure they can operate alongside the US Navy. It is extremely important for isolated nations such as these to maintain good relations with the current global maritime power.
In a world that tends toward disorder, the future is always uncertain. Rimpac exercises are an important staple of New Zealand/Australia/US military relations and likely will be long into the future.






















Comments and questions6
Massive dose of common sense. The sooner we have the USA back in port and even establishing a base here the better.
Glad to see someone is talking common sense at last.
The world does not tend toward disorder, it tends toward order. The relatively tiny police forces nations need measured in proportion to their populations illustrates this. The world is more cohesive than ever before because of trade. You could remove 80 percent of the US navy's placements and nothing would change. Trade is trade's own best assurance. US warships intimidate no one of any real concern. Wars are fought and won on land. From Vietnam to Iraq - where warships were used to enforce blockades of medicine that murdered one million Iraqis - warships in modern times prove almost useless. Ironically, Chinese influence is the subtext here, while it is China the insolvent US will borrow the money from - yet again - to fund this "exercise"...This is a joke. Nothing but show and distraction for a fleeting ex-power...China, like it or not, is the new dog in town. And they are not in any mood for war.
China is about 20 years away from floating a capable blue water fleet. It's refurbishment of the Russian Varyag aircraft carrier may look impressive but they are behind by about two generations of competent naval commanders with operational experience. The ship has not even conducted landing trials yet. China is by no means anywhere near being the new dog in town. The US outclasses the Chinese military on every front except perhaps cyber warfare.
"The 21 nations attending Rimpac display the global dependence on American naval power and how incredibly important each country considers training with the US military."
Russia is participating. Are you actually saying Russia is dependent on the American navy for anything? Are you saying Canada is concerned with China? They are very close and friendly trading partners. The hysterical Amerophila of this article borders of culthish. Naive and cultish.
"The US Navy will demonstrate its green fleet of biofuel-driven vessels"
Now this line gets to what this is really about - potential military industrial complex sales...It's the worlds largest sales pitch, nothing more.
What I'm pointing out is that the world trades with each other because the US Navy patrols the oceans. Without the US Navy performing this task, the world's oceans would likely be closed off for international trade in favour of special partnerships. The US Navy does real humanitarian good each day that it prevents this from happening. Protecting the world's oceans from localised strongmen is in both the US and international community's interests.