close
MENU
1 mins to read

Buyer pays dearly for cancelling property contract

The Supreme Court has put an end to Cromwell land stoush that has been going through the legal system since a property deal collapsed in 2008.Queenstown-based Chris James' company James Developments bought a 4.71ha Cromwell section from Mana Property Trus

Jazial Crossley
Mon, 18 Oct 2010

The Supreme Court has put an end to Cromwell land stoush that has been going through the legal system since a property deal collapsed in 2008.

Queenstown-based Chris James’ company James Developments bought a 4.71ha Cromwell section from Mana Property Trustee in 2008, paying a deposit of

Want to read more? It's easy.

Choose your subscription

Already have an account? Login

Smartphone Only Subscription

NZ$29.95 / monthly

Monthly Premium Online Subscription

NZ$49.95 / monthly

Smartphone Only Annual Subscription

NZ$299.00 / yearly

Yearly Premium Online Subscription

NZ$499.00 / yearly

Premium Group Membership 10 Users

NZ$385+GST / monthly

$38.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 20 Users

NZ$660+GST / monthly

$33 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 50 Users

NZ$1375+GST / monthly

$27.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 100 Users

NZ$2100+GST / monthly

$21 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Yearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace

NZ$999.00 / yearly

Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace

Student

Exclusive FREE offer for uni students studying at a New Zealand university (valued at $499).
Jazial Crossley
Mon, 18 Oct 2010
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.

Free News Alerts

Sign up to get the latest stories and insights delivered to your inbox – free, every day.

I’m already subscribed/joined

Free News Alerts

Sign up to get the latest stories and insights delivered to your inbox – free, every day.

I’m already subscribed/joined
Buyer pays dearly for cancelling property contract
9414
true