Capital Letter: Credit Contracts Act fails Supreme Court sniff test
Attribution of costs is notoriously difficult.
Hot Topic
DEALMAKERS
No one should think the Supreme Court’s dismissal last week, of credit providers’ appeals against findings their fees were unreasonable, is a ringing endorsement of the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003’s regulation of credit and default fees charged by financiers to consumers under
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your best value subscription option
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$44.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$24.95 / monthly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$350+GST / monthly
$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$600+GST / monthly
$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1250+GST / monthly
$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$1875+GST / monthly
$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Already have an account? Login
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Capital Letter: Credit Contracts Act fails Supreme Court sniff test
58234