“Defamation litigation is not for the faint-hearted. It requires a deep pocket,” Justice MacKenzie wrote in Haywood v Bray [2012]. Indeed, which is one reason so few defamation cases last the distance, let alone result in significant monetary compensation such as in the recent case involving Joe
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your subscription
Already have an account? Login
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$29.95 / monthly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$49.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Annual Subscription
NZ$299.00 / yearly
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$385+GST / monthly
$38.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$660+GST / monthly
$33 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1375+GST / monthly
$27.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$2100+GST / monthly
$21 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$999.00 / yearly
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Penny Pepperell of Capital Letter
Tue, 29 Apr 2014
Tue, 29 Apr 2014
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Capital Letter: How the Karam case sets the rules for digital defamations
37638