The Supreme Court’s latest judgment reads more like an Evidence Law textbook, limiting its interest to academics, specialist practitioners and law students, but the facts pique wider interest.
In HANNIGAN v R [2013] NZSC 41 per Elias CJ, McGrath, William Young, Chambers and Glazebrook JJ
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your best value subscription option
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$44.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$24.95 / monthly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$350+GST / monthly
$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$600+GST / monthly
$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1250+GST / monthly
$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$1875+GST / monthly
$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Already have an account? Login
Penny Pepperell of NBR Capital Letter
Wed, 01 May 2013
Wed, 01 May 2013
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Evidence law: hostile witnesses and veracity rules
29029