Following its first five-yearly review of the Evidence Act 2006, the Law Commission has pronounced the Act fit for purpose, with just one major matter to report.
The commission’s recommendation for the repeal of provisions dealing with prior consistent statements (s35) would mean a return
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your best value subscription option
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$44.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$24.95 / monthly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$350+GST / monthly
$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$600+GST / monthly
$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1250+GST / monthly
$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$1875+GST / monthly
$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Already have an account? Login
Penny Pepperell of NBR Capital Letter
Wed, 10 Apr 2013
Wed, 10 Apr 2013
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Evidence law review: fine tuning and a return to principles
28544