Hot Topic
EARNINGS
Guidance on what judges should do when faced with an indication that jurors are having difficulty in reaching a unanimous result has been given in a short Supreme Court decision.
It is HASTIE v R (SC, 23/7/2012; Elias CJ, Tipping, McGrath, William Young and Chambers JJ, [2012] NZSC 58, SC
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your best value subscription option
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
NZ$399.00 / yearly
Smartphone Only Annual Subscription
NZ$299.00 / yearly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$49.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$29.95 / monthly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$385+GST / monthly
$38.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$660+GST / monthly
$33 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1375+GST / monthly
$27.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$2100+GST / monthly
$21 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Already have an account? Login
Penny Pepperell for NBR Capital Letter
Wed, 25 Jul 2012
Wed, 25 Jul 2012
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Jury stalemate and judicial directions
22386