Fresh evidence interrupts FNZ hearing
Arguments over jurisdiction are temporarily diverted by late affidavit.
About 300 employee shareholders are behind the claim filed in July last year.
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
The second day of technical arguments over jurisdiction for a shareholder oppression claim against FNZ began with almost a moment of drama.
In a courtroom forested with black gowns, FNZ counsel Sarah Armstrong KC stood to raise an “evidentiary matter”.
There was a new affidavit, she said. “It
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your subscription
Already have an account? Login
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$29.95 / monthly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$49.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Annual Subscription
NZ$299.00 / yearly
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$385+GST / monthly
$38.5 per user - Pay by monthly
credit card debit
Premium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$660+GST / monthly
$33 per user - Pay by monthly
credit card debit
Premium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1375+GST / monthly
$27.5 per user - Pay by monthly
credit card debit
Premium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$2100+GST / monthly
$21 per user - Pay by monthly
credit card debit
Yearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$999.00 / yearly
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Student
Exclusive FREE offer for uni students studying at a New Zealand university (valued at $499).
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
