Legal issues raised in failed insider trading case
What next for the FMA and what could it have done differently?
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Legal experts agree the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) had to launch proceedings against former Eroad manager Hamish Sansom but the case itself raises the issue of using criminal versus civil actions.
Mr Sansom was found not guilty of insider trading by a jury in the High Court at Auckland
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your subscription
Already have an account? Login
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$29.95 / monthly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$49.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Annual Subscription
NZ$299.00 / yearly
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$385+GST / monthly
$38.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$660+GST / monthly
$33 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1375+GST / monthly
$27.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$2100+GST / monthly
$21 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$999.00 / yearly
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Dane Ambler
Tue, 25 Sep 2018
Tue, 25 Sep 2018
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Free News Alerts
Sign up to get the latest stories and insights delivered to your inbox – free, every day.
Free News Alerts
Sign up to get the latest stories and insights delivered to your inbox – free, every day.
Legal issues raised in failed insider trading case
Law,
76599