2 mins to read

Ralec misrepresented relationship with grain handlers, NZX lawyers say

NZX is suing for between $A20.7 million and $A37.6 million.

Sophie Boot
Tue, 03 May 2016

The former owners of the Australian Clear Grain Exchange made false representations about their relationships with Australian grain handlers, Wellington's High Court has heard.

Ralec is facing stock market operator NZX in what's expected to be a nine-week trial over NZX's purchase of the Australian Clear Grain Exchange in 2009. NZX is suing for between $A20.7 million and $A37.6 million, and Ralec has countered with a suit totalling $A14 million plus bonuses.

NZX claims Clear's former owners, Grant Thomas and Dominic Pym, and their companies Ralec Commodities and Ralec Interactive misled NZX when it bought the commodities trading platform with "wildly inaccurate" forecasts. Ralec subsequently filed a counterclaim against NZX, later adding the market operator's former chief executive Mark Weldon to the list of defendants. It claims NZX, which bought the platform for $A7 million with the potential for further earnouts, failed to fund the exchange sufficiently. The case pre-dates much of NZX's existing management, having first hit the courts in 2011.

Yesterday, NZX lawyer Brian Latimour told the court Messrs Thomas and Pym had misled NZX by characterising their relationship with bulk handling companies (BHCs) as positive. BHCs provide storage, handling and port terminal services for bulk grains, and are vital for growers wishing to export bulk grains.

"Clear's relationship with BHCs was, we submit, in fact, identified by Clear as a negative matter during Clear's first grain harvest over the summer of 2008 to 2009," Mr Latimour said.

A letter from Mr Pym to Mr Thomas from October 28, 2008, said Clear's issues with BHCs needed to be resolved, as they could seriously impact its business model, cashflow and survival, Mr Latimour said. Growers and buyers were uncertain about Clear's payment structure, and Clear had two clients which accounted for the majority of its business which it was desperate to keep happy, he said.

The grain exchange was set up to take advantage of the break-up of the Australian Wheat Board monopoly and was looking to capture a slice of the $A100 million to $A150 million growers spent annually on commissions to sell their products.

NZX wanted to use the exchange to expand its agricultural products offering and use it as the basis for an agri-portal for spot market and commodity data, though that hasn't eventuated due to Clear's muted trading volumes.

Earlier in the day, Ralec's counsel requested the proceedings be livestreamed to their clients and lawyers who will be in Australia for all or part of the trial, from the point when evidence is presented. NZX's lawyers said they needed to consult with their clients but would want to be clear about who had access to the live stream if it were to occur.

Opening statements for both sides have been predicted to take between five and six-and-a-half days.


Sophie Boot
Tue, 03 May 2016
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Ralec misrepresented relationship with grain handlers, NZX lawyers say