Retro-suppression unlikely in baby abduction case
A woman accused of abducting a new-born baby wants a judge to remove her name from lawfully published website reports.
It is a rare bid with wide implications for legitimate internet publishing.
But while agreeing to hear argument as to why he should make a retrospective suppression
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your best value subscription option
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
NZ Aviation News
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$44.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$24.95 / monthly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$350+GST / monthly
$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$600+GST / monthly
$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1250+GST / monthly
$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$1875+GST / monthly
$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Aviation News - Monthly
NZ$14.95 / monthly
Already have an account? Login
Jock Anderson
Tue, 31 Jan 2012
Tue, 31 Jan 2012
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Retro-suppression unlikely in baby abduction case
18665