A confusing snippet of legislation flagged as “unclear” by attorney-general Chris Finlayson is still to be discussed as part of a Judicature Act review.The piece of legislation, which stipulates a judge must not hold “office” unles
Liam Baldwin Mon, 08 Feb 2010
A confusing snippet of legislation flagged as “unclear” by attorney-general Chris Finlayson is still to be discussed as part of a Judicature Act review.
The piece of legislation, which stipulates a judge must not hold “office” unless the chief high court judge is satisfied it is compatible with
