close
MENU
Hot Topic DEALMAKERS
Hot Topic DEALMAKERS
2 mins to read

Building inspector avoids leaky liability through third party clause

Victoria Young for NBR NZ Property Investor
Tue, 22 Jul 2014

In a clear reminder of the importance of disclaimer clauses, a woman has lost part a High Court of leaky claim due to a technicality.

Jessica Astridge bought a Wellington apartment in 2001, which turned out to be leaky. Most of the apartments, located in Newtown, are rented to Massey

Want to read more? It's easy.

Choose your best value subscription option

Student

Exclusive offer for uni students studying at a New Zealand university (valued at $499).
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace

Yearly Premium Online Subscription

NZ$499.00 / yearly

Monthly Premium Online Subscription

NZ$44.95 / monthly

Smartphone Only Subscription

NZ$24.95 / monthly

Premium Group Membership 10 Users

NZ$350+GST / monthly

$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 20 Users

NZ$600+GST / monthly

$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 50 Users

NZ$1250+GST / monthly

$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 100 Users

NZ$1875+GST / monthly

$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Yearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace

NZ$499.00 / yearly

Already have an account? Login
Victoria Young for NBR NZ Property Investor
Tue, 22 Jul 2014
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Building inspector avoids leaky liability through third party clause
39707
true