In sexual offending cases where consent is argued as a defence, the ability to introduce evidence of the complainant’s sexual reputation would be very attractive in many cases. This is why evidence law has, since 1977, provided safeguards to prevent sexual complainants being subjected to
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your subscription
Already have an account? Login
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$29.95 / monthly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$49.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Annual Subscription
NZ$299.00 / yearly
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$385+GST / monthly
$38.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$660+GST / monthly
$33 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1375+GST / monthly
$27.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$2100+GST / monthly
$21 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$999.00 / yearly
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Penny Pepperell of Capital Letter
Tue, 28 Jan 2014
Tue, 28 Jan 2014
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Capital Letter: Courting around the ban on evidence of a complainant’s sexual reputation
35182