Capital Letter: Delicate balance in expert evidence in cases of sexual offending against children
Last week the Supreme Court released its decisions in two cases where the use of such evidence was challenged by the defence.
In cases of sexual offending against children, defence lawyers frequently attack credibility by honing in on behaviours of complainants such as delays in reporting offending, retracting allegations and continuing contact between victims and perpetrators. To correct potentially erroneous beliefs
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your subscription
Already have an account? Login
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$29.95 / monthly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$49.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Annual Subscription
NZ$299.00 / yearly
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$385+GST / monthly
$38.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$660+GST / monthly
$33 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1375+GST / monthly
$27.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$2100+GST / monthly
$21 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$999.00 / yearly
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Penny Pepperell of Capital Letter
Wed, 22 Apr 2015
Wed, 22 Apr 2015
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Free News Alerts
Sign up to get the latest stories and insights delivered to your inbox – free, every day.
Free News Alerts
Sign up to get the latest stories and insights delivered to your inbox – free, every day.
Capital Letter: Delicate balance in expert evidence in cases of sexual offending against children
47024