A bill introduced largely to counteract the effect of a Supreme Court decision on parliamentary privilege has returned from the Privileges Committee.
In Attorney-General and Gow v Leigh [2011], the Supreme Court held that statements by an official to a minister for the purposes of replying
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your best value subscription option
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$44.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$24.95 / monthly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$350+GST / monthly
$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$600+GST / monthly
$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1250+GST / monthly
$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$1875+GST / monthly
$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Already have an account? Login
Penny Pepperell of Capital Letter
Wed, 11 Jun 2014
Wed, 11 Jun 2014
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Capital Letter: Reinventing parliamentary privilege for the modern era
38703