Capital Letter: Swimming pool fencing: compliance irritations and child safety
A small bill that pushes all the buttons for the never ending nanny state vs personal responsibility debate was reported back from its select committee last week.
A small bill that pushes all the buttons for the never-ending nanny state vs personal responsibility debate was reported back from a select committee last week. The Building (Pools) Amendment Bill that would amend the Building Act 2004 and repeal the Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987, was
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your best value subscription option
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$44.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$24.95 / monthly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$350+GST / monthly
$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$600+GST / monthly
$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1250+GST / monthly
$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$1875+GST / monthly
$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Already have an account? Login
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Capital Letter: Swimming pool fencing: compliance irritations and child safety
57426