close
MENU
Hot Topic NBR Focus: GMO
Hot Topic NBR Focus: GMO
3 mins to read

Controversial employment law changes passed

KEY CHANGES


Employees can cash-in fourth week of holiday

90-day trial extended to all companies

Harder for unions to access workplace

Employers can ask for proof of illness
 

Employment law changes which were fiercely

NZPA
Wed, 24 Nov 2010

KEY CHANGES

  • Employees can cash-in fourth week of holiday
  • 90-day trial extended to all companies
  • Harder for unions to access workplace
  • Employers can ask for proof of illness
     

Employment law changes which were fiercely fought by unions and the Labour Party have been passed by Parliament.

The 90-day trial period for new employees has been extended to all businesses, and workers will be able to cash in the fourth week of their annual leave.

The separate bills passed their third readings yesterday, both on votes of 64 to 56.

Labour Minister Kate Wilkinson said the 90-day trial period, which previously applied to businesses with 20 or fewer employees, had been a success.

It was introduced soon after the 2008 election, amid strident union protest.

"Rather than have the sky falling in, as was hysterically proclaimed, employers of small and medium-sized businesses gained the confidence to hire new employees," Ms Wilkinson said.

"It is a fact that without the trial period, hundreds of New Zealand workers would not have the jobs they currently do have."

Ms Wilkinson said employers wanted to invest and grow their businesses but didn't want to face a personal grievance if they hired someone who turned out to be unsuitable.

"They simply chose not to hire anyone. The 90-day trial has changed that."

Labour MP Trevor Mallard, the party's labour relations spokesman, said extending the trial period was "just a continuation of the National Party's attack on the rights of wage and salary earners and their conditions".

It would not help the economy and was being done for political and ideological reasons, he said.

"It weakens the processes around job security, extends the range of reasons for dismissal, restricts substantially the right to appeal, and restricts the right to reinstatement," Mr Mallard said.

"This sort of attack drives down wages, it is a tool they are using."

Ms Wilkinson said the law change allowing employees to cash in their fourth week of leave would give them greater choice and flexibility.

"It is incredibly popular and I'm sure the public is very much looking forward to utilising it," she said.

"It is abundantly clear that only the employee can make this request -- if an employer does so they will be in breach of the Act."

Under the law change, employees can ask to cash in their fourth week of leave and employers must consider request within a reasonable time.

Employers don't have to agree, and don't have to give a reason for turning it down.

Labour MP Darien Fenton said it had taken unions 30 years to get a fourth week of annual leave.

"We got it in 2003, Australia had it in 1974," she said.

"The Government is advocating for longer hours at work...over time, it won't be a fourth week of leave, it will be part of salary and we will have lost it."

Another controversial measure in the bill is that it allows employers to ask for proof of illness after the first day of sick leave.

Ms Wilkinson said it would be used "very sparingly" and employers would have to pay for the proof.

"It is clear they will only request a medical certificate when they genuinely suspect someone of routinely pulling sickies," she said.

Ms Fenton said it was a stupid law change.

"No one asked for it, as far as we can tell," she said.

"We don't have a problem with sick leave, the problem is people going to work when they're ill."

National, ACT and United Future supported the bills. Labour, the Greens, the Maori Party and the Progressive Party opposed them.

The changes in both bills come into effect on April 1 next year.

NZPA
Wed, 24 Nov 2010
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Controversial employment law changes passed
10612
false