close
MENU
Hot Topic Long reads
Hot Topic Long reads
2 mins to read

Finlayson wants less emotion to wash over foreshore debate

Explosive language around the foreshore and seabed issue should be avoided if there is to be a lasting solution to the problem, Attorney General Chris Finlayson says.The government's preferred option is to replace the Foreshore and Seabed Act and declare

NZPA
Mon, 05 Apr 2010

Explosive language around the foreshore and seabed issue should be avoided if there is to be a lasting solution to the problem, Attorney General Chris Finlayson says.

The government's preferred option is to replace the Foreshore and Seabed Act and declare it a public domain, which no one can own, while reasserting the right of Maori to seek customary but not freehold title through the courts.

The discussion document has been cautiously welcomed by many, but Maori Party MP Hone Harawira believes all the coastline should be vested in Maori customary title as the existing law essentially stole freehold title from Maoridom.

Mr Finlayson says he hopes the debate will rise above such emotive language.

"I think that as we move forward it is important to avoid explosive terms like 'steal' or 'appropriate'. I am keen to seek to achieve a reconciliation of interests," he says.

"We could all look back to the past and throw sticks at one another, but I am seeking to rise above this and do the right thing for the country."

Labour MPs have reminded Mr Finlayson that previous National leaders have campaigned hard on the foreshore issue raising concerns that public access to the beaches could be lost to Maori ownership.

Mr Finlayson says things have changed.

"I am the first to admit that it is a different political environment from what it was seven years ago. I think there is a very good opportunity to work through this issue."

He says the definition of what sort of property rights customary title will bring and what will be needed to qualify for them will probably be the focus of the month-long consultation process underway.

Prime Minister John Key has said if there isn't widespread support for alternative legislation the existing act will remain in place.

The previous government enacted the Foreshore and Seabed Act after a 2003 Court of Appeal ruling in the Ngati Apa case that raised the possibility, in some narrow instances, for Maori customary title to convert into freehold title. That had the potential to put parts of the coastline under Maori control, and Labour legislated against it.

Widespread Maori opposition followed, and Tariana Turia quit Labour to form the Maori Party.

The discussion document makes clear the public domain concept is the government's preferred path.

Other options include:

• Restoring the right to claim customary title but retaining notional Crown ownership until customary rights were proven;

• Tinkering with the status quo; and

• Vesting ownership in Maori, determining who would hold ownership in a given area, while recognising others' rights.

Under all the options, the parts of the foreshore and seabed already in private ownership or subject to existing property rights will remain that way.

NZPA
Mon, 05 Apr 2010
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Finlayson wants less emotion to wash over foreshore debate
3911
false