Green light imminent for Bathurst's Escarpment mine
Company says it has received notice from the Environment Court that it will approve its environmentally controversial open-cast mining application.
Company says it has received notice from the Environment Court that it will approve its environmentally controversial open-cast mining application.
Bathurst Resources says it's received notice from the Environment Court that it will approve the company's long-delayed and environmentally controversial application to do open-cast mining for coking coal on the Denniston Plateau.
Bathurst had been in trading halt since yesterday afternoon. The shares did not move from the last traded price of 20 cents immediately after today's announcement.
Managing director Hamish Bohannan says in a statement to the NZX the court had informed parties that "consent is indicated for the Escarpment mine project, subject to final minor drafting on conditions of consent".
There was a 10-day deadline to conclude those issues, after which "we expect to receive consents as soon as the court has had time to consider that further information".
"Once consent is granted, Bathurst can move to the first stages of operations."
Bathurst plans eventually to take as much as four million tonnes a year of the high-grade coking coal, used in steel-making, from the Buller coal fields, with the Escarpment mine being the first of several planned for ecologically fragile uplands above Westport.
Resource consents were initially granted in August 2011, but faced numerous challenges, led by the Royal Forest & Bird Protection Society.
The court required Bathurst to negotiate stronger commitments to environmental protection and clean-up, and the final remaining matters related mainly to rehabilitation obligations and the proposed Denniston Permanent Protection Area.
"The company is required to use 'best endeavours' to achieve an appropriate protection mechanism for this area," Mr Bohannan says. "The court has expressed a preference for the local councils to be the suitable body to certify this has been the case."
Forest & Bird still has one outstanding attempted appeal against the proposal. It sought special leave from the Court of Appeal to look again at whether a permitted Solid Energy mine, known as the Sullivan Block, should have been considered as a factor in the resource consent application.
Both the Environment and High Courts have rejected this argument, reasoning that a mining permit is not sufficient to begin mining and that a resource consent would be required.
Bathurst's experience of delays has been a bugbear to its many Australian shareholders, who are accustomed to far faster consent decisions.
The share price has gained 21.9 percent in the last month, but has traded as low as 13 cents a share in the last year, compared to prices above $1.80 a share in early 2011.
(BusinessDesk)