close
MENU
Hot Topic Budget 25
Hot Topic Budget 25
2 mins to read

Hitches with Christchurch rubble clearance

Christchurch recycling and waste specialist, Richard Lloyd, is concerned about a council decision to allow contractors to dump unsorted building waste into “clean fills.”He said the decision suspends a 2004 bylaw that effectively protects prec

Chris Hutching for NBR NZ Property Investor
Tue, 21 Sep 2010

Christchurch recycling and waste specialist, Richard Lloyd, is concerned about a council decision to allow contractors to dump unsorted building waste into “clean fills.”

He said the decision suspends a 2004 bylaw that effectively protects precious aquifers from contamination. The move has been rushed and not thought through, he said.

The bylaw ensured only genuine inert hardfill material (brick, concrete etc) could be deposited in the quarries and clean fills around Christchurch.

Mr Lloyd, who has more than 15 years’ experience in recovery of materials, said there were many unanswered questions and he believes dumping is continuing daily.

“We must consider the long-term repercussions of this unregulated dumping. What resources have been put in place to make sure only building waste is deposited in these holes? Where are these holes situated? Will the council dig it all up and sort it at a later date? The council has not made a decision on recovering the dumped material and now it is too late. The clean fill operators have reduced their charges for receiving this material to the point where it will not be economically viable to go back and recover it later,” he said.

Mr Lloyd said that by suspending the requirement to sort and recycle material, a large amount of “other” material is ending up in some clean fill sites.

“I am aware of one site that has been taking in milk and alcoholic beverages along with demolition waste. While the council has clearly stated this is not acceptable, I believe the operator knows he is unlikely to be held to account under the current circumstances. And even if he is found culpable, the penalty will be far less than the profit made from accepting this waste.”

Mr Lloyd is adamant that better management of the removal of earthquake rubbish and rubble now will ensure better outcomes in the long term and it must be a major consideration of local government.

“This kind of unregulated dumping has serious long-term implications for our city and surrounds. I commend the council for taking decisive action in an effort to get the city functioning again, however I implore our councillors to consult with industry experts and the community before making decisions that may in the end prove more harmful than helpful,” he said.

Chris Hutching for NBR NZ Property Investor
Tue, 21 Sep 2010
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.

Free News Alerts

Sign up to get the latest stories and insights delivered to your inbox – free, every day.

I’m already subscribed/joined

Free News Alerts

Sign up to get the latest stories and insights delivered to your inbox – free, every day.

I’m already subscribed/joined
Hitches with Christchurch rubble clearance
8670
false