close
MENU
Law
3 mins to read

Law firm to pay $1m costs after defence 'lacked merit'

Ruling mulls question of 'animosity' between law firm's insurer and the plaintiff's litigation funder.

Auckland High Court.

Tim Hunter Wed, 06 Dec 2023

The High Court has ordered law firm Grimshaw & Co to pay costs of $1.02 million on top of $3.3m in damages, plus interest, after it was found negligent in its advice to a body corporate.

In a costs judgment dated November 27, Justice Kiri Tahana said Grimshaw & Co’s conduct in defending the

Want to read more? It's easy.

Choose your subscription

Already have an account? Login

Smartphone Only Subscription

NZ$29.95 / monthly

Monthly Premium Online Subscription

NZ$49.95 / monthly

Smartphone Only Annual Subscription

NZ$299.00 / yearly

Yearly Premium Online Subscription

NZ$499.00 / yearly

Premium Group Membership 10 Users

NZ$385+GST / monthly

$38.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 20 Users

NZ$660+GST / monthly

$33 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 50 Users

NZ$1375+GST / monthly

$27.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 100 Users

NZ$2100+GST / monthly

$21 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Yearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace

NZ$999.00 / yearly

Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace

Student

Exclusive FREE offer for uni students studying at a New Zealand university (valued at $499).
Tim Hunter Wed, 06 Dec 2023
Contact the Writer: thunter@nbr.co.nz
News tip? Question? Typo? Let us know: editor@nbr.co.nz
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.

Free News Alerts

Sign up to get the latest stories and insights delivered to your inbox – free, every day.

I’m already subscribed/joined

Free News Alerts

Sign up to get the latest stories and insights delivered to your inbox – free, every day.

I’m already subscribed/joined
Law firm to pay $1m costs after defence 'lacked merit'
Law,
102015
true