Name suppression threshold "too high" - QC
“For lawyers and clients, you're almost at the stage of, ‘What's the point?'" With special feature audio.
A high-profile criminal lawyer does not believe it is good the threshold for qualifying for name suppression has become “extremely difficult” as figures show cases have halved since 2011.
In fact, changing the test from “undue hardship” to “extreme hardship” has left many clients and lawyers
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your best value subscription option
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$44.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$24.95 / monthly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$350+GST / monthly
$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$600+GST / monthly
$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1250+GST / monthly
$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$1875+GST / monthly
$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Already have an account? Login
Hamish McNicol
Wed, 27 Apr 2016
Wed, 27 Apr 2016
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Name suppression threshold "too high" - QC
57650