close
MENU
2 mins to read

Negligent law firm loses costs case

Whacked $100,000 damages for its negligence over a soured motel buying deal, Tauranga law firm Sharp Tudhope has lost its court fight to pay costs.Despite the Court of Appeal (Justices Ellen France, Warwick Gendall and Mark Cooper) suggesting Justice Paul

Jock Anderson
Wed, 21 Jul 2010

Whacked $100,000 damages for its negligence over a soured motel buying deal, Tauranga law firm Sharp Tudhope has lost its court fight to pay costs.

Despite the Court of Appeal (Justices Ellen France, Warwick Gendall and Mark Cooper) suggesting Justice Paul Heath look again at a costs order against

Want to read more? It's easy.

Choose your subscription

Already have an account? Login

Smartphone Only Subscription

NZ$29.95 / monthly

Monthly Premium Online Subscription

NZ$49.95 / monthly

Smartphone Only Annual Subscription

NZ$299.00 / yearly

Yearly Premium Online Subscription

NZ$499.00 / yearly

Premium Group Membership 10 Users

NZ$385+GST / monthly

$38.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 20 Users

NZ$660+GST / monthly

$33 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 50 Users

NZ$1375+GST / monthly

$27.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 100 Users

NZ$2100+GST / monthly

$21 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Yearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace

NZ$999.00 / yearly

Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace

Student

Exclusive FREE offer for uni students studying at a New Zealand university (valued at $499).
Jock Anderson
Wed, 21 Jul 2010
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.

Free News Alerts

Sign up to get the latest stories and insights delivered to your inbox – free, every day.

I’m already subscribed/joined

Free News Alerts

Sign up to get the latest stories and insights delivered to your inbox – free, every day.

I’m already subscribed/joined
Negligent law firm loses costs case
6894
true