NZ POLITICS DAILY: MMP stitch-ups
National's strategic deals with Act in Epsom and Ohariu come at a price. PLUS: John Key's Washington visit | Horizon poll | Labour in trouble again over ads.
Bryce Edwards
Mon, 25 Jul 2011
Sometimes it’s hard to see why New Zealand went with Mixed Member Proportional Representation, when if we really wanted a Proportional Representation system we could have gone for the ‘real deal’ and left the electorate component out of the equation and just had 120 list MPs.
It would certainly solve a lot of MMP’s problems that are continually complained about. The latest complaint is around so-called ‘electorate stich-ups’, with National’s strategic deals in Epsom and Ohariu being the focus of much political commentary in the last week. The must-read account of the moment is by Claire Trevett – see:
Deals on the table, this time with a price. Trevett explains that the Epsom and Ohariu deals shouldn’t really be seen as remarkable, and it’d be more newsworthy if such deal making wasn’t happening. But she does point out that there are in fact two reasons that the 2011 ‘stitch-ups’ are different:
(1) ‘This is the first time National has extracted a price in return. Deals have been made under which Act will not stand candidates in at least two marginal seats to maximise National's chances - Waimakariri, held by Labour's Clayton Cosgrove, and New Plymouth, which National's Jonathan Young holds with a tiny majority. Up to eight others are under negotiation’; and
(2) ‘the usual quiet hints have increased to loudhailer volume. In the past it wasn't done to openly admit you were working the system, even though most parties did it to some extent’. The other decent account of the MMP ‘stitch-ups’ is by Anthony Hubbard – see:
The Epsom equation – in which he comes up with a fantastic quote about the Epsom deal, by Green candidate David Hay: ‘National has selected a candidate it doesn't want to win [Goldsmith], in order to support a candidate they don't want in parliament [Act candidate and former Nat John Banks], to get someone else in parliament that the Epsom voters wouldn't vote for [Act leader Don Brash.]’. Another very astute piece of analysis by Hubbard can also be read in his article,
Top dogs, battlers... and Hone.
Today’s content:
Electorate deals
John Key’s Washington visit
Israeli spy allegations
SST Editorial: How spin doctors botched news of accidental spy [Not currently online]
Horizon poll
Child welfare
SAS in Afghanistan
Political communication
Maori politics
Other
Bryce Edwards
Mon, 25 Jul 2011
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.