Parliament's Privileges' Committee is investigating the implications from last year's Supreme Court which prevented a defamation case against Trevor Mallard.
The nub of the case is a defamation claim involving Labour's then environment minister Mr Mallard, who used parliamentary privilege to
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your subscription
Already have an account? Login
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$29.95 / monthly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$49.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Annual Subscription
NZ$299.00 / yearly
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$385+GST / monthly
$38.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$660+GST / monthly
$33 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1375+GST / monthly
$27.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$2100+GST / monthly
$21 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$999.00 / yearly
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Blair Cunningham
Thu, 20 Sep 2012
Thu, 20 Sep 2012
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Privileges Committee to look at implications of absolute-privilege ruling
23955