Scorecard for 'media-hungry' SFO boss Feeley
When Adam Feeley was appointed Serious Fraud Office director in late 2009, there was a joke doing the rounds among Wellington lawyers:
When Adam Feeley was appointed Serious Fraud Office director in late 2009, there was a joke doing the rounds among Wellington lawyers:
When Adam Feeley was appointed Serious Fraud Office director in late 2009, there was a joke doing the rounds among Wellington lawyers: Now would be a good time to commit serious fraud.
The ambitious qualified lawyer, fresh from the helm of the Eden Park Development Board, made it clear from the "get-go" mundane mortgage and employment-related fraud would not be the priority on his watch.
Instead, Mr Feeley was after the high-profile finance companies which had just fallen like dominoes.
Although investors had been left billions of dollars out of pocket, the SFO had yet to lay any charges against finance company directors.
Mr Feeley went straight for the headline-grabbing cases, a focus linked to one of the big criticisms levelled at Mr Feeley this week, when his tenure at the SFO ended.
Some in the legal fraternity have described the outgoing boss as “media hungry”.
While Mr Feeley was more forthcoming about investigations on the SFO's books, industry insiders say he had his media favourites.
If the alleged fraud wasn’t going to get Mr Feeley the column inches, some say harshly, the SFO wasn’t interested in investigating.
“If it hasn’t been sexy high-profile stuff it has been a bit hard to get them engaged,” one lawyer spoken to by NBR ONLINE said.
The SFO's limited budget – $9.9 million this year compared to $5.2 million when Mr Feeley joined – ho doubt played a role in steering his allocation of priorities.
And as insolvency practitioner Damien Grant, of Waterstone Insolvency – who admired Mr Feeley’s ‘get stuff done’ approach – told NBR ONLINE: "Feeley made a decision to accept a lower success rate than the ridiculously failure-adverse one that he inherited."
Finance company focus
The Bridgecorp file, gathering dust when Mr Feeley started, was one of the first finance company files he resurrected, and for which he can claim a slice of the courtroom success.
Although the Bridgecorp investigation predated Mr Feeley, it was on his watch the fraud charges were laid against Rod Petricevic and Rob Roest in relation to luxury spending with Bridgecorp money.
Separately, the pair pleaded guilty to the charges at Auckland District Court in July and August, adding four months and three months to their existing six-and-a-half year sentences.
Ironically, the Bridgecorp file also threw up one of Mr Feeley’s more embarrassing moments on the job, after raising a glass to the laying of criminal charges against now imprisoned Petricevic, with a bottle of Gosset champagne lifted from the office of the former Bridgecorp boss.
That story certainly gave him headlines.
In the last few years hardly a week went by, it seemed, without a press release from the SFO, and headline writers have had a field day coming up with new words to describe its various probes, inquiries and investigations.
It is in the finance company space that Mr Feeley’s success is most obviously measured and where he may have proven some of his detractors wrong.
With the exception of Hanover Finance, the SFO said it has closed all major finance company investigations.
Of course, he can’t claim all of the SFO's scalps in the courtroom so far. Many of the investigations began before he took up the role.
For a list of his courtroom wins, see the scorecard below.
Lawyers spoken to by NBR, none of whom were prepared to be named, credit the SFO for this year’s successful prosecution of Capital + Merchant Finance directors for $28 million fraud – described as one of the most complicated finance company trials seen in this country.
However, one lawyer can’t believe the SFO didn’t “nail” two of the directors over a $14.4 million related-party loan known as the "Hub" transaction
The SFO is seeking to appeal the not guilty verdicts against Neal Nicholls and Wayne Douglas from a separate Capital + Merchant trial in April-May.
Jailing criminal finance company directors is a legacy Mr Feeley seems happy to leave after bowing out early from his five-year contract.
In exit interviews before he heads off to be chief executive of Queenstown and Lakes District Council, he claimed the jail sentences handed down to company directors had sent a “chill” through boardrooms.
In the legal fraternity, lawyers spoken to by NBR ONLINE agree Mr Feeley had been good in the finance company space, but there was frustration over his allocation of priorities.
“He has seemed very media hungry – not necessarily appropriate for someone in a prosecutorial role,” one lawyer said. “The SFO is there to prosecute all manner of fraud. Not just the one-off spikes in bad behaviour.
“If you talk to anyone who does work in the fraud space they will tell you the two constant themes in life and it is mortgage fraud and employment-related fraud.”
A balanced approach from the SFO was seen to be important given “complete inadequacy of the police to manage fraud cases”, another lawyer said.
To some, it seemed the SFO couldn’t have made a more contrasting appointment when Mr Feeley replaced his predecessor Grant Liddell.
According to Damien Grant: “The fact he celebrated his wins with bottles of purloined plonk and gave away Alan Hubbard's books as booby prizes shows he was passionate about his work – something lacking in many of the faceless and timid minions that fill the hallowed halls of the state.
“He was a character, he got some convictions and he made a difference. We could do with more public servants like him.”
Restoring a battered reputation
A private investigator said Mr Feeley had succeeded in changing the public's perception of the SFO.
When he joined, the SFO was in need of a public figure to reassure a market reeling from finance company collapses.
Mr Feeley had performed that role well.
The perception shift of the SFO under Feeley was from slow-moving beast to a more responsive agency
“The old-school SFO did not have a high level of visibility. It was largely established investigators and lawyers working to their own agenda – and the SFO was their own comfy place.
“One of the first things he did was clear some of those people out.”
Although Mr Feeley’s immediate office shake-up – the SFO lost close to a third of its staff in his first year - was controversial, it had created a team better able to respond to the need for swift prosecution action, the investigator said.
Criticisms Mr Feeley was media hungry were unfair. Chasing the big cases was part of the SFO’s remit as a small agency on a tight budget.
“The ‘serious’ in its title should be taken to mean cases with lots and lots of money or of significant public interest,” the investigator said.
Adam Feeley’s scorecard
As Mr Feeley left the SFO’s Britomart, Auckland, office this week, the agency had 31 open investigations on its books, but still no replacement for the director.
The SFO said it had opened 40 new investigations in the last financial year – the greatest number in the course of a year to date – none of which are finance companies.
It said 86% of those investigations had been completed within their prescribed timeframe in the year so far.
This compared to Mr Feeley’s first year in office, when 15 investigations were started and 18% completed within prescribed timeframe.
The average age of an open investigation was now 185 days, compared to 279 days in 2010.
In the three years Mr Feeley led the white-collar crime agency, 76 people were charged under SFO-led prosecutions.
Courtroom wins
(Some cases jointly brought by the Financial Markets Authority).
Stephen Versalko
Datasouth Finance
B’On Financial Services
Belgrave Finance
Capital + Merchant Finance
Five Star Group
Prosecutions under way
Dominion Finance
Grant Herbert
Loizos Michaels
Lane Walker Rudkin Group
Natural Dairy Land Transactions
South Canterbury Finance
gbond@nbr.co.nz