Why Hotchin companies had to fail
A Nathans Finance prospectus which sought $100 million from investors by claiming the company was well managed with no bad debts was not true, the Auckland High Court was told.
“That’s what was being shown to investors but it was not true,” Securities Commission witness David Crichton – a
Want to read more? It's easy.
Choose your subscription
Already have an account? Login
Smartphone Only Subscription
NZ$29.95 / monthly
Monthly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$49.95 / monthly
Smartphone Only Annual Subscription
NZ$299.00 / yearly
Yearly Premium Online Subscription
NZ$499.00 / yearly
Premium Group Membership 10 Users
NZ$385+GST / monthly
$38.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 20 Users
NZ$660+GST / monthly
$33 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 50 Users
NZ$1375+GST / monthly
$27.5 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitPremium Group Membership 100 Users
NZ$2100+GST / monthly
$21 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debitYearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace
NZ$999.00 / yearly
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
Jock Anderson
Thu, 21 Apr 2011
Thu, 21 Apr 2011
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Why Hotchin companies had to fail
14044