Last year brought Netflix euphoria. I figured out how to access it from New Zealand and fell in love.
Where I had been ripping my DVD collection to hard disk to save on storage costs, punting boxes of DVDs to the garage, I started just checking whether each was available on Netflix. It's easier to stream than to rip.
And so the New Year brought a reduction in Netflix's stock of film rights. Where rights-holders had been happy to sell them streaming rights at low costs when Netflix wasn't much of a competitive threat to their cable offerings, that changed when folks started seeing them instead as substitutes. Bloomberg explains that they just can't maintain their library on $8/month subscription fees.
I'm sure that the Bloomberg piece is right. But what about $40/month subscription fees? I'd be happy to pay that much for streaming access to everything in Netflix's DVD collection. They could call it Netflix Premium.
I don't know that this strategy could work. The rights-holders would rightly expect that most Premium subscribers would be substituting away from some of their (potentially) higher value cable subscribers, and, more importantly, away from their DVD and Blue-Ray offerings. But they'd likely also be picking up some who never would have paid for a DVD but were hitting the Pirate Bay.
Things that consequently need testing:
Dr Eric Crampton is a senior lecturer in economics at the University of Canterbury. He blogs at Offsetting Behaviour.