NZ POLITICS DAILY: Is NZ a racist country?
PLUS: David Lange's legacy as the champion of our nuclear-free policy is coming under attack as a result of Gerald Hensley's new book.
PLUS: David Lange's legacy as the champion of our nuclear-free policy is coming under attack as a result of Gerald Hensley's new book.
Is New Zealand a racist country?
That was the debate last week on TV3’s The Vote programme (which you can watch here). The debate ended with an almost 2:1 majority of viewers agreeing that we do live in a racist country (although David Farrar quite correctly points out that the results need to be seen for what they are – see: It’s not a poll).
The discussion continues this week in the media and blogosphere – especially in items like Susan Edmunds’ We're not racist, but ..., and Heather McCracken’s Migrant groups claim NZ not racist country despite poll. And although the new Race Relations Commissioner, Susan Devoy, sat on the fence on the night of the TV3 debate and made some strange comments (New Zealanders should feel ‘ashamed that they perceive themselves as a racist country"), she has now given a more coherent and strident speech – see Amy Maas’ Dame Susan Devoy: Racism shames Kiwis.
While much of the original criticism centered on comments she had made before her appointment, a recent talk at a Hamilton fundraiser won’t have re-assured her detractors: ‘When asked about the nature of her work by the MC, Dame Susan responded with the line "same s***, different day"…. Another disgruntled guest said Dame Susan had described her Wellington staff as "difficult", before making an off-colour joke about men with sausages in their pockets”’ – see TVNZ’s Dame Susan Devoy's speech labelled a 'train crash'.
The education sector is another one of the areas where issues of race and ethnicity are most strongly fought out, and at the moment the Government is looking to establish the Te Pa o Rakaihautu school in Christchurch, with Pita Sharples leading the process – see Charley Mann’s Talks under way on Maori school. And race and ethnicity is still a sensitive area for artists, and Dick Frizzell has been on the receiving end of criticism for his use of Maori imagery in his art – see Yvonne Tahana’s Mickey to Tiki still causing stir.
That watering down probably prompted the formation of an ‘Independent Iwi Constitutional Working Group’ by Margaret Mutu and Moana Jackson. But fears that the official group was ‘racially stacked’ led the conservative New Zealand Centre for Political Research think tank to create its own Independent Constitutional Review Panel chaired by Canterbury law lecturer David Round, ‘with the goal of heading off the Maori Party plan to "give the tribal elite supreme power in New Zealand". (You can watch Round and Te Ururoa Flavell discuss the issues on Q+A.)
The power play continues with John Armstrong backing the political necessity for Labour’s staunch approach to electricity reform: ‘The policy presents a clear alternative. Labour will lose if it fights next year's campaign with the kind of insipid policies it used in 2011’ – see: Labour's two fingers draw the battle lines. But Tracy Watkins thinks both Labour and the Greens underestimated the backlash, comparing it to the business-led ‘winter of discontent’ attacks on the Clark government’s first term – see: Power play – there's a lot riding on it. Both columns are well worth reading. The NBR also has two other interesting perspectives - Rodney Hide’s It’s the market, stupid: that’s how power works, and Rob Hosking’s Why the Greens 'Hey, Clint' moment matters.
David Lange’s legacy as the champion of our nuclear-free policy is coming under attack as a result of Gerald Hensley’s new book. The latest claim is that Lange misled his deputy, his cabinet, the US and the Labour Party about his negotiations over ship visits – see the NBR’s 'Friendly Fire' claims Lange didn't tell Palmer about US ship visit. See also, Audrey Young’s Lange offered to quit over Anzus, and Selwyn Manning’s In Defence Of New Zealand’s Last True Statesman.
Will the rise of the Greens change the basic nature of our parliamentary politics? Matthew Hooton argues in his latest NBR column that the duopoly of New Zealand’s two-party system has meant that until now we have had two major parties hugging the centre of the political spectrum, offering only bland options to voters. Utilising political science theories about the media voter model, and arguing that the continued rise of the Greens means we now have a real three-party system, Hooton suggests that the recent NZ Power policy was the just the first of many we’re likely to see: ‘more such radicalism should be expected, offering voters broader choices, so that the 2014 election may well be the first for many years to be more about policy than personality’ – see: Two's company, three's a crazy.
Also writing in the latest Metro magazine, Hooton has a scathing evaluation of John Key, saying that although he is ‘the greatest political salesperson New Zealand has ever known’, he has failed: ‘by declining to set and communicate a clear agenda, he has been driven even more than most prime ministers by the media issues of the day’.
Sign up to get the latest stories and insights delivered to your inbox – free, every day.